Systematic reviewindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-SUP-123 standard review

Diet to treat anaemia in pregnancy

Effectiveness of Dietary Interventions in Prevention and Treatment of Iron-Deficiency Anemia in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Overview

Skolmowska D et al.. Nutrients 2022 · PMID 35893877 · DOI 10.3390/nu14153023

Seven small trials suggest that diet changes, fortified foods or counselling can raise haemoglobin in pregnancy, but the evidence is weak.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: low

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

To test food-based approaches against anaemia in pregnancy.

How was the study done?

Systematic review of 7 trials.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Not stated.

What was actually found?

Dietary interventions improved haemoglobin.

How large was the observed effect?

Not pooled.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Diet matters, but it is not shown to replace iron tablets when anaemia is present.

What are the study's limitations?

Few, biased trials; fortified foods contain added iron.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly supports the idea that diet matters; does not support the ban.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot show diet alone is enough in anaemia.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Skolmowska D et al.
Journal
Nutrients
Year
2022
Identifier
PMID 35893877 DOI 10.3390/nu14153023 · PMC9332092
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

COI statement in record: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

2. Research question

Are dietary interventions effective in preventing and treating iron-deficiency anaemia in pregnancy?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Systematic review – Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (no meta-analysis)
Population

Anaemic or mixed pregnant women

Country

Multinational

Period

Search to June 2021

Sample size

7 RCTs (participant total not stated in abstract)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

RCTs of dietary interventions (fortified foods, regular foods, counselling)

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Dietary interventions incl. iron-fortified products and counselling

Comparator

Placebo, supplementation or control

Endpoints

Haemoglobin and other iron indices

Statistical methods

Narrative synthesis; RoB 2

5. Actual results

Results

All included dietary interventions (increased iron, multiple nutrients, or counselling) were reported effective on haemoglobin; most studies medium risk of bias, some high risk.

Absolute risks

not reported in abstract

Authors' conclusion

Dietary interventions were effective, but more rigorous RCTs are needed to confirm this.

6. Strengths

  • PROSPERO-registered; RoB 2

7. Weaknesses

  • Only 7 heterogeneous trials
  • Several interventions used iron-fortified products, i.e. added iron
  • No pooled estimates; medium-high risk of bias

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Narrative synthesis.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

No pooled effect; cannot compare with supplementation.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Best available supporting-side evidence: diet and counselling can raise haemoglobin; it does not show that diet can replace iron treatment in anaemic pregnant women.

11. Independent contrary findings

Fortified foods are themselves a form of added iron.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Applicable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Weak support for diet as one tool; no support for banning supplements.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitylow
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitynot replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceunknown
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Head-to-head comparisons of diet vs supplements in anaemia.

15. Linked fact checks