Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkfull text checked I-UPF-06 standard review

How the EU regulates food additives

European Commission: Re-evaluation of food additives (incl. Q&A on titanium dioxide, Regulation (EU) 2022/63) and EU rules on food additives (Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008)

Overview

European Commission (DG SANTE). European Commission website 2026 (accessed)

EU additives need authorisation, are re-evaluated, and E171 was banned in 2022.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Regulatory framework for food additives in the EU.

How was the study done?

Official regulatory information pages (read).

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Not applicable; Not applicable

What was actually found?

All EU additives must be authorised and listed with conditions of use (Reg. 1333/2008, Annex II Union list) based on safety assessment, technological need and not misleading consumers. Additives permitted before 20 January 2009 are re-evaluated by EFSA under Reg. (EU) 257/2010. Regulation (EU) 2022/63 (adopted 14 January 2022, in force 7 February 2022) withdrew the authorisation of titanium dioxide (E171), with transitional measures.

How large was the observed effect?

Not applicable

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Additives are checked and can be withdrawn.

What are the study's limitations?

Regulatory status may change

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports C-UPF-09; context for C-UPF-11.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Directly applicable in EU/Germany.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Safety of any individual additive not mentioned.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
European Commission (DG SANTE)
Journal
European Commission website
Year
2026 (accessed)
Identifier
Verification
verified – URL fetch 2026-10-25: https://food.ec.europa.eu/food-safety/food-improvement-agents/additives/re-evaluation_en and https://food.ec.europa.eu/food-safety/food-improvement-agents/additives/eu-rules_en
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
full text
Conflicts of interest and funding

Not applicable

2. Research question

Regulatory framework for food additives in the EU.

3. Study design and population

Study design
Guideline / position statement – Official regulatory information pages (read).
Population

Not applicable

Country

EU

Period

Accessed 2026-10-25

Sample size

Not applicable

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Not applicable

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Food additives

Comparator

Not applicable

Endpoints

Authorisation status

Statistical methods

Not applicable

5. Actual results

Results

All EU additives must be authorised and listed with conditions of use (Reg. 1333/2008, Annex II Union list) based on safety assessment, technological need and not misleading consumers. Additives permitted before 20 January 2009 are re-evaluated by EFSA under Reg. (EU) 257/2010. Regulation (EU) 2022/63 (adopted 14 January 2022, in force 7 February 2022) withdrew the authorisation of titanium dioxide (E171), with transitional measures.

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Not applicable.

6. Strengths

  • Primary official source

7. Weaknesses

  • Regulatory status may change

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Not applicable.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Not applicable.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports C-UPF-09; context for C-UPF-11.

11. Independent contrary findings

None.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Directly applicable in EU/Germany.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Authoritative.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitynot replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Egyptian equivalent rules not verified.

15. Linked fact checks