Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-UPF-116 standard review
Diet drinks and heart disease
Intake of Sugar-Sweetened and Low-Calorie Sweetened Beverages and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
Overview
Yin J et al.. Adv Nutr 2021 · PMID 32696948 · DOI 10.1093/advances/nmaa084
Each daily diet drink was linked to 7% more cardiovascular disease across cohort studies; the authors warn this may reflect who drinks them.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
To link sweetened drinks with heart disease.
- How was the study done?
Meta-analysis of cohorts.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
8 articles on diet drinks.
- What was actually found?
Diet and sugary drinks both linked to more CVD.
- How large was the observed effect?
RR 1.07 per serving.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Water is the safest choice.
- What are the study's limitations?
Reverse causation.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Supports the association in C-UPF-07.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Applicable.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Cannot prove sweeteners cause CVD.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Yin J et al.
- Journal
- Adv Nutr
- Year
- 2021
- Identifier
- PMID 32696948 DOI 10.1093/advances/nmaa084 · PMC7850046
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
No COI statement in PubMed record; funding listed: NIMHD NIH HHS
2. Research question
Are sugar-sweetened (SSB) and low-calorie sweetened beverages (LCSB) associated with CVD?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Meta-analysis – Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
- Population
Adults in cohorts
- Country
Multinational
- Period
Search to 1 December 2019
- Sample size
8 articles on LCSB (18,077 incident CVD cases, 14,114 CVD deaths); 11 on SSB
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Prospective cohorts
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
LCSB and SSB intake
- Comparator
Per serving/day
- Endpoints
CVD incidence and mortality
- Statistical methods
Dose-response meta-analysis
5. Actual results
- Results
LCSB: +1 serving/day CVD incidence RR 1.07 (1.05-1.10; I2 0%); CVD mortality association non-linear, significant above 2 servings/day. SSB: CVD incidence RR 1.08 (1.02-1.14); CVD mortality 1.08 (1.04-1.13).
- Absolute risks
not reported in abstract
- Authors' conclusion
LCSB were associated with higher CVD risk, but interpretation may be complicated by reverse causation and residual confounding.
6. Strengths
- Dose-response
- Multiple cohorts
7. Weaknesses
- Reverse causation (people at risk switch to diet drinks)
- Beverages, not total sweetener intake
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- AMSTAR 2
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Abstract only.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Upper CI rounding asymmetry minor.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Shows the CVD link for sweetened (diet) drinks is replicated across cohorts, beyond NutriNet-Sante.
11. Independent contrary findings
Reverse causation acknowledged by authors.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Applicable.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Supports 'linked to CVD' as an association.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | high |
| Directness | indirect |
| Reproducibility | replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Causality.
15. Linked fact checks
- Artificial sweeteners (aspartame, acesulfame-K, sucralose) are linked to higher cancer and cardiovascular risk. – Studies supporting the claim