Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-VEG-101 in-depth review

Changing vitamin K intake shifts warfarin effect

Role of dietary vitamin K intake in chronic oral anticoagulation: prospective evidence from observational and randomized protocols.

Overview

Franco V et al.. Am J Med 2004 · PMID 15121490 · DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.036

In 12 patients, a diet low in vitamin K raised INR from 2.6 to 3.3 within a week, and a vitamin K-rich diet lowered it from 3.1 to 2.8.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

To test whether dietary vitamin K changes anticoagulation.

How was the study done?

Observational follow-up plus a randomized crossover feeding trial.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

39 clinic patients; 12 in the trial.

What was actually found?

Vitamin K intake was linked to both over- and under-anticoagulation; both diet changes moved INR.

How large was the observed effect?

INR +0.7 (depleted), -0.3 (enriched).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Large sudden changes in greens intake can change how strongly warfarin works.

What are the study's limitations?

Tiny sample, 4-day diets, extreme changes.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports that greens can affect warfarin, but the problem is CHANGE in intake; stopping greens is also a change.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applies to all vitamin K antagonists.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot show that a stable intake of greens is harmful.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Franco V et al.
Journal
Am J Med
Year
2004
Identifier
PMID 15121490 DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.036
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Does dietary vitamin K intake affect anticoagulation stability in patients on long-term oral anticoagulation?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Prospective observational protocol (39 outpatients, 230 visits) plus randomized crossover dietary intervention (12 stable patients, 4-day in-hospital diets)
Population

Outpatients on chronic oral anticoagulation (coumarin) at an anticoagulation clinic

Country

Brazil (Porto Alegre; from author affiliation in the PubMed record)

Period

not stated in abstract

Sample size

39 (observational) + 12 (randomized crossover)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Vitamin K-enriched diet (about 500% increase) or vitamin K-depleted diet (about 80% decrease) relative to baseline

Comparator

Baseline diet / crossover

Endpoints

INR; over- and under-anticoagulation

Statistical methods

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression (observational); paired comparison of INR (crossover)

5. Actual results

Results

Observational: vitamin K intake score inversely associated with anticoagulation level and independently associated with both over- and under-coagulation. Crossover: INR rose from 2.6 +/- 0.5 to 3.3 +/- 0.9 at day 7 on the vitamin K-depleted diet (P = 0.005) and fell from 3.1 +/- 0.8 to 2.8 +/- 0.6 at day 4 on the vitamin K-enriched diet (P = 0.04).

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

The interaction between vitamin K and coumarin is a clinically relevant, major independent factor that interferes with anticoagulation stability.

6. Strengths

  • Randomized crossover with controlled in-hospital diets
  • Tests both directions (more and less vitamin K)

7. Weaknesses

  • Very small (n = 12 in the trial)
  • Short exposure (4 days)
  • Extreme dietary changes (+500% / -80%)
  • Semiquantitative intake score in observational part

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Small crossover, open dietary intervention; outcome (INR) is objective.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Recalculated relative changes: +27% INR with depletion, -10% with enrichment (stats/C-VEG-12_warfarin.py). Direction consistent with pharmacology.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Direct: shows that large changes of dietary vitamin K in either direction shift INR. Removing vitamin K raised INR (bleeding direction).

11. Independent contrary findings

Schurgers 2004 found food-borne vitamin K had a short-lived effect; Sconce 2007 and Dentali 2016 link LOW intake to instability.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Pharmacology is universal; applies to warfarin and phenprocoumon users in Europe and Egypt.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Small but direct controlled evidence that large changes in vitamin K intake alter INR; supports advice for consistent intake, not avoidance.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Effect size of realistic day-to-day changes in leafy-green intake.

15. Linked fact checks