Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-VEG-111 in-depth review

European paediatricians: offer green vegetables to infants

Complementary Feeding: A Position Paper by the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Committee on Nutrition.

Overview

Fewtrell M et al.. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2017 · PMID 28027215 · DOI 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001454

ESPGHAN advises starting solids between 4 and 6 months and offering varied foods including bitter green vegetables.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Give complementary-feeding recommendations.

How was the study done?

Position paper.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Not applicable.

What was actually found?

Green vegetables recommended from 4-6 months.

How large was the observed effect?

Not applicable.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Vegetables are part of normal infant feeding after the first months.

What are the study's limitations?

Consensus document.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts removing vegetables for children; context for infant nitrate warning.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

European.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Does not quantify nitrate risk.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Fewtrell M et al.
Journal
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
Year
2017
Identifier
PMID 28027215 DOI 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001454
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

When and how should complementary foods be introduced to healthy term infants in Europe?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Guideline / position statement – Position paper / consensus statement of the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition
Population

Healthy term infants in Europe

Country

Europe

Period

Published 2017

Sample size

not applicable

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Complementary feeding practices

Comparator

not applicable

Endpoints

Recommendations

Statistical methods

Narrative review and expert consensus

5. Actual results

Results

Complementary foods should not be introduced before 4 months nor delayed beyond 6 months; infants should be offered foods with a variety of flavours and textures including bitter-tasting green vegetables; no sugar or salt; vegan diets only under medical/dietetic supervision.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Recommendations as stated, including offering green vegetables during complementary feeding.

6. Strengths

  • Authoritative European paediatric nutrition body

7. Weaknesses

  • Consensus, not a formal GRADE guideline
  • Healthy term infants in Europe

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Expert consensus.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

not applicable

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Shows that paediatric guidance recommends green vegetables for infants from 4-6 months; the infant nitrate risk concerns earlier ages and badly stored purees.

11. Independent contrary findings

Infant methaemoglobinaemia case series (Savino 2006, Martinez 2013).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

European guidance.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Removing vegetables from children's diets conflicts with paediatric guidance.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitynot replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

none

15. Linked fact checks