Risk assessmentindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-VEG-115 standard review

EFSA on nitrate in spinach for babies

Statement on possible public health risks for infants and young children from the presence of nitrates in leafy vegetables

Overview

EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM). EFSA Journal 2010 · DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1935

EFSA judged spinach nitrate unlikely to be a concern for most infants, but could not exclude risk for some, and warned that badly stored cooked vegetables form nitrite.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Assess infant nitrate risk from leafy vegetables.

How was the study done?

Risk assessment.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Not applicable.

What was actually found?

Some infant risk; storage key; avoid spinach during GI infections.

How large was the observed effect?

Not applicable.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Use fresh or frozen vegetable purees; be careful with spinach for small children.

What are the study's limitations?

Modelling-based.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports infant-specific claim.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

EU.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

No outcome data.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
Journal
EFSA Journal
Year
2010
Identifier
DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1935
Verification
verified – Crossref record and abstract fetched 2026-10-26 (EFSA web page returned HTTP 403)
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

EFSA (public agency)

2. Research question

Are nitrates in lettuce and spinach a health risk for infants and young children?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Risk assessment – Scientific risk assessment statement
Population

Infants and young children (EU)

Country

European Union

Period

2010

Sample size

not applicable

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Nitrate in spinach and lettuce at current/proposed maximum levels

Comparator

Health-based reference values

Endpoints

Risk characterization

Statistical methods

Exposure scenarios

5. Actual results

Results

Nitrate exposure from spinach cooked from fresh at current or proposed maximum levels is unlikely to be a health concern for infants, although a risk for some infants eating more than one spinach meal a day cannot be excluded; lettuce not a concern for children; spinach may raise exposure to levels of concern for some young children; inappropriate storage of cooked vegetables converts nitrate to nitrite and increases methaemoglobinaemia potential; recommended against feeding spinach to children with bacterial gastrointestinal infections.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

As stated in results.

6. Strengths

  • Official EU risk assessment

7. Weaknesses

  • 2010; exposure modelling rather than outcome data

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Agency risk assessment.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

not applicable

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Confirms infant-specific nitrate concern, the role of storage, and extra caution with gastrointestinal infection.

11. Independent contrary findings

none

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

EU.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports the claim for infants; does not support avoidance by older children or adults.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

none

15. Linked fact checks