Risk assessmentindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-VEG-134 standard review

EFSA: raw leafy greens top plant-food hazard

Scientific Opinion on the risk posed by pathogens in food of non-animal origin. Part 1 (outbreak data analysis and risk ranking of food/pathogen combinations).

Overview

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). EFSA J 2013 · PMID 42124987 · DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3025

EFSA ranked Salmonella in raw leafy greens as the highest-risk plant food combination; outside the 2011 sprout outbreak, plant foods caused 5% of outbreak deaths.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Rank pathogen risks in plant foods.

How was the study done?

Risk ranking.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

EU outbreaks 2007-2011.

What was actually found?

Leafy greens top; melons ranked.

How large was the observed effect?

FoNAO 10% outbreaks.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Wash and handle salads safely; serious cases are uncommon.

What are the study's limitations?

Outbreak data.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports the claim.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

EU.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

No per-serving risk.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
Journal
EFSA J
Year
2013
Identifier
PMID 42124987 DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3025
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

EFSA (public agency)

2. Research question

Which food-of-non-animal-origin/pathogen combinations pose the greatest risk in the EU?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Risk assessment – EFSA scientific opinion: outbreak data analysis and risk ranking of food/pathogen combinations
Population

EU outbreak data (EU Zoonoses Monitoring)

Country

European Union

Period

2007-2011

Sample size

EU-wide outbreak data

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Food of non-animal origin (FoNAO)

Comparator

Food of animal origin

Endpoints

Outbreaks, cases, hospitalisations, deaths; risk ranking

Statistical methods

Multi-criteria ranking model (7 criteria)

5. Actual results

Results

FoNAO associated with 10% of outbreaks, 26% of cases, 35% of hospitalisations and 46% of deaths (2007-2011); excluding the 2011 VTEC O104 outbreak: 10%, 18%, 8% and 5%. Top-ranked combination: Salmonella and leafy greens eaten raw; then Salmonella with bulb/stem vegetables, tomatoes, melons, and pathogenic E. coli with fresh pods, legumes or grain.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Leafy greens eaten raw are the top-ranked FoNAO hazard combination in the EU.

6. Strengths

  • EU-wide data; explicit ranking

7. Weaknesses

  • Outbreak-based; dominated by one 2011 event

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Agency risk assessment.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Without the single sprout outbreak, FoNAO accounted for 5% of outbreak deaths (stats/C-VEG-03_outbreaks.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

European confirmation that leafy greens (and melons) rank highest among plant foods for pathogen risk, with modest share of severe outcomes outside 2011.

11. Independent contrary findings

Painter 2013 (deaths mainly poultry).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

EU.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports the claim and its limits.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

none

15. Linked fact checks