Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-WHT-115 in-depth review

Trials found whole grains do not change body weight or waist

Whole-Grain Consumption Does Not Affect Obesity Measures: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Overview

Sadeghi O et al.. Adv Nutr 2020 · PMID 31390462 · DOI 10.1093/advances/nmz076

In 21 randomised trials, eating whole instead of refined grains did not change weight, BMI, waist or fat mass.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Whole grains and obesity in RCTs.

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

1798 adults.

What was actually found?

No effect on obesity measures.

How large was the observed effect?

Waist WMD 0.06 cm.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Swapping bread type alone does not slim you.

What are the study's limitations?

Short trials; reporting error.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts causal claim.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot exclude long-term effects.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Sadeghi O et al.
Journal
Adv Nutr
Year
2020
Identifier
PMID 31390462 DOI 10.1093/advances/nmz076 · PMC7073321
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections

Corrigendum published: Adv Nutr 2020;11(2):468 (doi 10.1093/advances/nmz130; PDF-only, content not read).

Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Does whole-grain consumption affect obesity measures?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs
Population

Adults >=18 years in RCTs

Country

International

Period

Searches to February 2019

Sample size

21 studies, 1798 participants

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

RCTs of whole-grain products/diets vs control

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Whole grains

Comparator

Control diets (mostly refined grains)

Endpoints

Body weight, BMI, waist, fat mass, body fat %

Statistical methods

Random-effects WMD

5. Actual results

Results

No significant effect on body weight (19 studies), BMI (10 trials), body fat % (WMD 0.27; -0.05 to 0.58), fat mass (0.45; -0.12 to 1.02 kg), fat-free mass (reported as 0.31; -0.67 to 0.06 kg - point estimate outside its CI, probable sign error), waist (0.06; -0.50 to 0.63 cm).

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Findings do not support whole-grain intake for controlling obesity measures.

6. Strengths

  • RCTs only
  • Registered protocol

7. Weaknesses

  • Short trials
  • Mostly isocaloric designs
  • Reporting error in abstract; corrigendum exists (content not read)

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Reporting inconsistency.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Fat-free mass WMD 0.31 lies outside its CI (-0.67 to 0.06); likely -0.31 (stats/C-WHT-06).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Contradicts a causal role of refined vs whole grains in obesity measures in the short term.

11. Independent contrary findings

I-WHT-114 (long-term cohort association).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Important counter-evidence to causal wording.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Long-term trials.

15. Linked fact checks