Nezam El-Tayebat Fact CheckA scientific assessment of the “نظام الطيبات” nutrition system
Choose country

True Certainty of evidence: high provisional C-CHK-09

Chicken carries Campylobacter and Salmonella, which cause human infections.

Safety note: Cook poultry thoroughly and avoid cross-contamination; seek medical care for bloody diarrhoea, high fever or dehydration, especially in children and older people.
Conclusion: Raw chicken commonly carries Campylobacter and Salmonella; cooking and hygiene control this risk.
  1. Original statement
  2. Scientific assessment
  3. In plain language
  4. Studies on this claim
  5. Regional context
  6. What applies in my country?
  7. References

Original statement

بيتكلموا بقى ان الكامبيلو باكتر ... والسالمونيلا هم جوه الفراخ اه هم جوه الفراخ ما فيهاش كلام

verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.

Translation

Chicken carries Campylobacter and Salmonella, which cause human infections.

Origin

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
بدأت قناة ＂Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي＂ بثًا مباشرًا لايف حلو (Open source)
Published
10 April 2026
Timestamp
not available (transcript has no timings)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.
Claimed health effect

Campylobacteriosis, salmonellosis.

Population concerned

general population (not specified)

Geographic restriction by Elawady

none found

Diverging source versions

Source status
Archive editors
Attribution
Archive editors (not Elawady)
Origin
https://eltayebat.com/rule/industrial-chicken/
Attribution uncertainty
Narrative and study selection written by the archive operators; the archive states the forbidden section is documented independently of Dr. Diaa's words.

Scientific assessment

True – The statement is supported by robust evidence.

Certainty of evidence: high – Further research is very unlikely to change the assessment.

1. What was claimed?

Campylobacter and Salmonella are found in chicken.

2. What is demonstrably correct?

This is correct. Campylobacteriosis accounted for 63.7% of confirmed human zoonosis cases reported in the EU in 2024 and broiler meat was most frequently implicated in strong-evidence Campylobacter outbreaks; a US outbreak of multidrug-resistant S. Heidelberg (634 cases) was traced to one poultry company.

3. What is wrong or exaggerated?

The implication that this makes chicken inedible is not supported: infections are prevented by thorough cooking and kitchen hygiene, and EFSA describes on-farm control options.

4. What remains unclear?

Not applicable.

5. Which studies support it?

I-EGG-14, I-CHK-05, A-CHK-07, A-CHK-17.

6. Which studies contradict it?

None.

7. What applies to Germany and Europe?

EU process hygiene criterion: 1000 CFU/g Campylobacter on neck skins of chilled broiler carcasses (Regulation (EC) 2073/2005).

8. What is known about Egypt?

High Salmonella prevalence in broiler chains reported (I-CHK-09).

9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?

Handle raw chicken separately, do not wash it under the tap, and cook it through.

Assessment details

Rationale for certainty of evidence

EU surveillance: campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis are the two most reported zoonoses; broiler meat is the food most frequently implicated in strong-evidence Campylobacter outbreaks; Salmonella in eggs/egg products is the agent-food pair of most concern; outbreak investigations confirm chicken as a vehicle.

Source quality

Own words consistent with surveillance data.

Regional transferability

Applies in the EU and Egypt; magnitude differs.

Individual exceptions

Severe courses more likely in infants, older and immunocompromised people.

Regional scope of the claim
general (biological/medical)
Last reviewed
25 October 2026 provisional

In plain language

It is true that raw chicken often carries Campylobacter and Salmonella bacteria. In Europe, Campylobacter is the most common cause of food-borne bacterial infection, and chicken is a main source. These germs are killed by thorough cooking. Keeping raw chicken away from other foods in the kitchen prevents most infections.

Studies on this claim

Studies supporting the claim (5)

  • EU zoonoses report 2024

    EFSA, ECDC. EFSA J 2025 · PMID 41377167 · DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9759
    Otherindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study

    Campylobacter and Salmonella are the most common food-borne infections in the EU; about 5% of fresh chicken samples and 0.3% of egg samples had Salmonella.

    Chicken carries Campylobacter and Salmonella, which cause human infections.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Occurrence of zoonoses and zoonotic agents in humans, food, animals and feed in the EU, 2024

    How was the study done?

    EU surveillance report under Zoonoses Directive 2003/99/EC

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    e.g., 95,954 fresh broiler meat samples; 12,327 egg samples; 27 EU Member States, UK (NI), 8 non-MS

    What was actually found?

    Campylobacteriosis 63.7% of confirmed zoonosis cases, salmonellosis second. Salmonella-positive: fresh meat from broilers 4.9%, turkeys 4.7%, eggs and egg products 0.31%. Adult laying-hen flock Salmonella prevalence 4.0%, target serovars 1.6%. Salmonella in eggs and egg products = agent/food pair of most concern; broiler meat most frequently implicated in strong-evidence Campylobacter outbreaks. Campylobacter PHC 1000 CFU/g on neck skin.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Descriptive; trend analyses

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Poultry germs are a real but controllable risk.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Reporting differences between countries; Operator vs official sampling differ

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports existence of pathogens; contradicts exaggerated prevalence.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Directly EU.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Not representative for Egypt.

    Scientific details →

  • EFSA: controlling Campylobacter in broilers

    EFSA BIOHAZ Panel. EFSA J 2020 · PMID 32874298 · DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6090
    Risk assessmentindependent cross-checkfull text checked

    Farm measures could reduce human Campylobacter infections from chicken meat substantially.

    Chicken carries Campylobacter and Salmonella, which cause human infections.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Effect of on-farm control options on human campylobacteriosis from broiler meat

    How was the study done?

    EFSA scientific opinion (PAF modelling, expert knowledge elicitation)

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    Not applicable; EU broiler production

    What was actually found?

    In the EU, about 27% of broiler flocks and 37% of fresh broiler meat carry Campylobacter (2008 baseline: 71% of batches, 76% of carcasses); chicken meat may cause 20-30% of human cases. Farm measures could cut broiler-related cases by roughly 7-27% each (very uncertain); a 3-log cut in gut counts by 58%.

    How large was the observed effect?

    PAF; EKE

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    The risk is real and can be reduced.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Wide uncertainty

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports pathogen claim, not avoidance.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Directly EU.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Exact effect sizes; combined effects; anything about digestibility or gut damage from chicken meat.

    Scientific details →

  • Resistant Campylobacter linked to poultry in the US

    Kassenborg HD et al.. Clin Infect Dis 2004 · PMID 15095200 · DOI 10.1086/381597
    Case-control studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked

    Domestic resistant infections were linked to eating chicken or turkey at restaurants.

    Chicken carries Campylobacter and Salmonella, which cause human infections.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    What are risk factors for fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter infection?

    How was the study done?

    Population-based case-control study (FoodNet)

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    858 isolates tested; 64 FQ-resistant vs 582 susceptible with travel data; 33 matched case-control pairs; Patients with Campylobacter infection and matched controls

    What was actually found?

    11% resistant. Travel OR 7.6 (4.3-13.4). Domestic cases: eating chicken or turkey at commercial establishment matched OR 10.0 (1.3-78).

    How large was the observed effect?

    OR, matched OR

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Poultry can transmit resistant Campylobacter.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Very wide CI (only 33 pairs); Recall bias

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Moderate.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Precise risk size.

    Scientific details →

  • US Salmonella outbreak from one chicken company

    Gieraltowski L et al.. PLoS One 2016 · PMID 27631492 · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0162369
    Outbreak reportcited by the Tayebat archivefull text checked

    634 people fell ill from resistant Salmonella traced to one company's chicken.

    Chicken carries Campylobacter and Salmonella, which cause human infections.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    What caused a large multistate MDR Salmonella Heidelberg outbreak?

    How was the study done?

    Outbreak investigation (epidemiological, laboratory, traceback)

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    634 cases; 435 interviewed; 634 US case-patients

    What was actually found?

    634 sick (38% hospitalised, no deaths); 87% of those with brand data ate Company A chicken; 67% of tested patient isolates resistant, 35% multidrug-resistant; Salmonella in 26% of samples at the implicated plants, down to about 5% after fixes.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Descriptive

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Shows why safe handling of raw chicken matters.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Single outbreak

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports existence of hazard.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Moderate.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Cannot give routine prevalence in chicken and does not support an 80-85% contamination rate.

    Scientific details →

  • Salmonella in Egyptian broiler chickens

    Elkenany R et al.. BMC Vet Res 2019 · PMID 31029108 · DOI 10.1186/s12917-019-1867-z
    Cross-sectional studyindependent cross-checkfull text checked

    About 29% of retail chicken carcasses and 32% of farm chickens in one Egyptian province had Salmonella, mostly multidrug-resistant.

    Chicken carries Campylobacter and Salmonella, which cause human infections.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Prevalence, resistance and virulence genes of Salmonella in broilers and retail carcasses

    How was the study done?

    Cross-sectional microbiological survey

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    420 samples from 5 broiler farms and 5 retail shops, El-Sharkia, summer 2017

    What was actually found?

    Salmonella in 28.6% of all samples (carcasses 29.4%, cloacal swabs 32%, environment 22%); 76.7% of isolates multidrug-resistant; all resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; none to imipenem.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Descriptive

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    In Egypt, careful handling and cooking of chicken is especially important.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Only 5 farms and 5 shops in one province, one season; no human data; descriptive only.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports concern but not 80-85%.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Low (Egypt).

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Not national.

    Scientific details →

Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (0)

No studies in this group.

Studies with mixed or unclear results (0)

No studies in this group.

Regional context

Germany / EU

EU process hygiene criterion: 1000 CFU/g Campylobacter on neck skins of chilled broiler carcasses (Regulation (EC) 2073/2005).

Egypt

High Salmonella prevalence in broiler chains reported (I-CHK-09).

What applies in my country?

General scientific assessment

True Raw chicken commonly carries Campylobacter and Salmonella; cooking and hygiene control this risk.

The following areas of food safety are relevant to this statement:

  • Veterinary medicines and antibiotics
  • Hormonal growth promoters
  • Contaminants (heavy metals, PFAS, PCBs, dioxins, nitrate)
  • Pathogens (Salmonella, Campylobacter, etc.)
  • Animal husbandry and feed
  • Controls, imports, recalls, labelling

Poultry

Choose a country to see the checked information for it.

Limits: legal rules describe what is allowed, not what every single food contains. Measurement data come from samples and are meaningful only together with their method details.

Country of residence or purchase Compare with another country

References

  1. The European Union One Health 2024 Zoonoses Report.. EFSA, ECDC. EFSA J 2025 · PMID 41377167 · DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9759
  2. Update and review of control options for Campylobacter in broilers at primary production.. EFSA BIOHAZ Panel. EFSA J 2020 · PMID 32874298 · DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6090
  3. Fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter infections: eating poultry outside of the home and foreign travel are risk factors.. Kassenborg HD et al.. Clin Infect Dis 2004 · PMID 15095200 · DOI 10.1086/381597
  4. National Outbreak of Multidrug Resistant Salmonella Heidelberg Infections Linked to a Single Poultry Company.. Gieraltowski L et al.. PLoS One 2016 · PMID 27631492 · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0162369
  5. Antimicrobial resistance profiles and virulence genotyping of Salmonella enterica serovars recovered from broiler chickens and chicken carcasses in Egypt.. Elkenany R et al.. BMC Vet Res 2019 · PMID 31029108 · DOI 10.1186/s12917-019-1867-z

← Back to overview