Concerns about arsenic in rice are unfounded and can be dismissed ('we love arsenic').
Original statement
الرز فيه زرنيخره بيضر ما فيش مشكله يا حبيبي احنا بنحب الزرنيخ
verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.
Translation
Concerns about arsenic in rice are unfounded and can be dismissed ('we love arsenic').
Origin
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! النسيج البيني و مقدمة عن الكلي (Open source)
- Published
- 23 July 2025
- Timestamp
- 1:05:36 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Machine transcript; sarcastic remark in a live stream, context: a patient told she should avoid rice because of arsenic.
- Claimed mechanism
None.
- Claimed health effect
Rice arsenic is irrelevant.
- Population concerned
Everyone.
- Geographic restriction by Elawady
none found
Diverging source versions
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الدراسات اللي ينشرها لمعرفة مدي تخبط الطب حتي ٢٠٢٥ (Open source)
- Published
- 26 July 2025
- Timestamp
- not available (transcript has no timings)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Machine transcript: mocks other commentators who said 'rice contains arsenic'.
Scientific assessment
Mostly false – Essential parts of the statement are not supported by the evidence or are strongly exaggerated.
Certainty of evidence: moderate – Further research may still affect the assessment.
1. What was claimed?
Rice arsenic is not a concern.
2. What is demonstrably correct?
Normal rice consumption from regulated supply is not acutely dangerous; detection is not the same as harmful exposure.
3. What is wrong or exaggerated?
Dismissing the issue entirely contradicts EFSA's conclusion of a health concern and the EU maximum levels; rice is a main exposure source.
4. What remains unclear?
Arsenic content of rice consumed in Egypt (not reviewed).
5. Which studies support it?
None.
6. Which studies contradict it?
7. What applies to Germany and Europe?
EU maximum levels for inorganic arsenic (Reg. (EU) 2023/915, as reproduced in EFSA 2024): non-parboiled milled rice 0.15 mg/kg; parboiled and husked rice 0.25; rice flour 0.25; rice cakes/waffles 0.30; rice for infant food 0.10 mg/kg.
8. What is known about Egypt?
Rice is consumed daily in Egypt, sometimes in large amounts; exposure may be higher than European averages; local monitoring data were not reviewed.
9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?
Rice can be eaten, but variety in grains and cooking rice in excess water reduce exposure; rice-based foods for infants should comply with stricter limits.
Assessment details
- Rationale for certainty of evidence
EFSA (2024) identifies rice and rice products as main contributors to dietary inorganic arsenic exposure in Europe and concludes that margins of exposure for adults (2 to 0.4 mean; 0.9 to 0.2 high consumers) raise a health concern (I-GRN-06). The EU therefore sets maximum levels (Reg. 2023/915: 0.15 mg/kg white rice; 0.10 mg/kg rice for infant food). Partly fair: for an adult eating normal portions of regulated rice the individual absolute risk is small; the concern is greatest for infants, young children and very high consumers.
- Source quality
Sarcastic live-stream remark.
- Regional transferability
Arsenic levels vary by origin; Egyptian rice data were not reviewed here.
- Individual exceptions
Infants and young children are more vulnerable.
- Regional scope of the claim
- general (biological/medical)
- Last reviewed
- 25 October 2026 provisional
In plain language
Rice naturally takes up arsenic from soil and water. The European Food Safety Authority says rice is a main source of arsenic in the diet and that current exposure is a health concern, especially for young children. The EU has legal limits for arsenic in rice. Eating rice normally is not dangerous in the short term, but laughing off the issue is not justified.
Studies on this claim
Studies supporting the claim (0)
No studies in this group.
Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (1)
-
EU food safety assessment of arsenic
EFSA CONTAM Panel. EFSA J 2024 · PMID 38239496 · DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8488Risk assessmentindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key studyArsenic exposure from food, mainly rice, is a health concern; the EU limits arsenic in rice.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Arsenic risk
- How was the study done?
Risk assessment
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
EU population
- What was actually found?
Health concern; rice main source
- How large was the observed effect?
MOE 0.2-2
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Variety and regulated rice reduce exposure
- What are the study's limitations?
Uncertainties
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Contradicts 'no problem'
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Directly applicable
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Individual risk from normal portions
No study in this group is marked as key.
Studies with mixed or unclear results (0)
No studies in this group.
Regional context
Germany / EU
EU maximum levels for inorganic arsenic (Reg. (EU) 2023/915, as reproduced in EFSA 2024): non-parboiled milled rice 0.15 mg/kg; parboiled and husked rice 0.25; rice flour 0.25; rice cakes/waffles 0.30; rice for infant food 0.10 mg/kg.
Egypt
Rice is consumed daily in Egypt, sometimes in large amounts; exposure may be higher than European averages; local monitoring data were not reviewed.
- Food-safety governance and official controls
- Pesticide residues in fruit and vegetables on the EU/German market (incl. imports from Egypt)
- Pesticide residues in produce sold on the Egyptian domestic market
- Antibiotic (veterinary drug) residues in poultry meat and eggs
- Antimicrobial use in food animals and antibiotic growth promoters
- Hormones in poultry, meat, milk and farmed fish
- Dioxins, PCBs and PFAS in eggs and other animal foods
- Aflatoxin M1 in milk and dairy products
- Aflatoxins in groundnuts (peanuts)
- Heavy metals in fish
- Farmed fish (aquaculture): drugs, water source and controls
- Import controls and the meaning of RASFF notifications for Egyptian products
What applies in my country?
General scientific assessment
Mostly false Rice arsenic is a recognised, regulated long-term concern, not something to dismiss.
The following areas of food safety are relevant to this statement:
- Pesticides and pesticide residues
- Veterinary medicines and antibiotics
- Hormonal growth promoters
- Contaminants (heavy metals, PFAS, PCBs, dioxins, nitrate)
- Mycotoxins (mould toxins)
Eggs · Poultry · Dairy · Fish and seafood · Red meat · Fruit and vegetables · Cereals and rice
Choose a country to see the checked information for it.
Limits: legal rules describe what is allowed, not what every single food contains. Measurement data come from samples and are meaningful only together with their method details.
Country of residence or purchase Compare with another country
References
- Update of the risk assessment of inorganic arsenic in food.. EFSA CONTAM Panel. EFSA J 2024 · PMID 38239496 · DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8488