Unclear / insufficient evidence Certainty of evidence: very low provisional C-ORG-02

Children who eat 'proper food' from infancy do not develop enlarged tonsils, adenoids or appendicitis; formula milk and infant cereals are the reason children need these operations.

Safety note: Breastfeeding is recommended (I-INTC-14). When an infant is not breastfed, commercial infant formula is the safe alternative; it should not be replaced by home-made milks or plant drinks. Children with signs of sleep apnoea, recurrent severe throat infections or suspected appendicitis need medical assessment.
Conclusion: Unproven: breastfeeding is beneficial, but formula has not been shown to cause the need for tonsil, adenoid or appendix surgery.

Original statement

موضوع بقى الالبان الصناعي والسريلاك وكل ده زباله عشان كده العيال كلها في سن خمس سنين يجيله لحميه ولوز وزايده وشيل يا معلم

verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.

Translation

Children who eat 'proper food' from infancy do not develop enlarged tonsils, adenoids or appendicitis; formula milk and infant cereals are the reason children need these operations.

Origin

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! انتاج الطاقة مرتبط بانتاج الجذور الحرة (Open source)
Published
14 September 2025
Timestamp
0:26:00 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.
Claimed mechanism

Wrong food causes lymphoid tissue disease.

Claimed health effect

Tonsil/adenoid hypertrophy, appendicitis.

Population concerned

Children

Geographic restriction by Elawady

none found

Diverging source versions

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الدراسات اللي ينشرها لمعرفة مدي تخبط الطب حتي ٢٠٢٥ (Open source)
Published
26 July 2025
Timestamp
not available (transcript has no timings)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); wording may contain transcription errors; no timestamps available.

Scientific assessment

Unclear / insufficient evidence – The data do not allow an assessment either way.

Certainty of evidence: very low – Any assessment is very uncertain.

1. What was claimed?

Diet from infancy prevents these diseases; formula causes them.

2. What is demonstrably correct?

Breastfeeding is recommended and protects against childhood infections (I-INTC-14). A small study found that children breastfed for longer had appendicitis less often than their siblings (I-INTC-12).

3. What is wrong or exaggerated?

The claim that 'all children' develop enlarged tonsils, adenoids or appendicitis because of formula and infant cereals is not supported. In one large clinical study of referred snoring children, breastfeeding was associated with sleep apnoea, a main reason for adenotonsillectomy (I-INTC-13); that study compared breastfeeding with no breastfeeding (not formula or infant cereals specifically), measured sleep apnoea rather than tonsil or adenoid size or surgery, and used a highly selected sample, so it limits the claim but does not show that formula does not cause adenotonsillar hypertrophy.

4. What remains unclear?

Whether infant feeding has a causal effect on appendicitis or adenotonsillar hypertrophy is unknown; the available studies are small or confounded, and no study of infant cereals was found.

5. Which studies support it?

I-INTC-12 (weak association between breastfeeding and less appendicitis); I-INTC-14 (fewer infections with breastfeeding; surgery not addressed).

6. Which studies contradict it?

I-INTC-13 (breastfeeding associated with OSAS in a clinical sample, likely confounded); I-ORG-06 (tonsillectomy indications based on infection frequency and documented sleep apnoea).

7. What applies to Germany and Europe?

Most cited cohorts are Scandinavian (Denmark, Sweden) and directly European; RCTs from the UK and Finland are directly transferable. Guidelines in Europe also emphasize defined indications (not verified here in detail).

8. What is known about Egypt?

No Egypt-specific data on rates or outcomes of tonsillectomy, cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, splenectomy or thyroid surgery were identified in this review.

9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?

No conclusion possible; the claim is unproven.

Assessment details

Rationale for certainty of evidence

A targeted search found only indirect or weak evidence. One small sibling case-control study associated longer breastfeeding with less appendicitis (I-INTC-12). Breastfeeding protects against childhood infections, but surgical outcomes are not addressed (I-INTC-14). In a large clinical sample, breastfeeding (not formula) was associated with childhood sleep apnoea, a main indication for adenotonsillectomy, probably due to confounding (I-INTC-13). Indications for tonsillectomy are defined by infection frequency and documented sleep apnoea (I-ORG-06). No study supports the claim that formula or infant cereals are 'the reason' children need these operations.

Source quality

Assertion without data.

Regional transferability

n/a

Individual exceptions

n/a

Regional scope of the claim
general (biological/medical)
Last reviewed
25 October 2026 provisional

In plain language

Elawady said that formula milk and infant cereals are why children develop enlarged adenoids, tonsils and appendicitis. Breastfeeding has real benefits, such as fewer infections, and one small study linked longer breastfeeding to less appendicitis. But no study shows that formula is the reason children need these operations, and one large study even found sleep apnoea more often in breastfed children, probably for other reasons. The idea remains unproven.

Studies on this claim

Studies supporting the claim (0)

No studies in this group.

Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (2)

  • What is linked to sleep apnoea in children

    Xu Z et al.. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020 · PMID 32131901 · DOI 10.1186/s40463-020-0404-1
    Cross-sectional studyindependent cross-checkfull text checked

    Enlarged tonsils and adenoids, obesity and male sex were linked to sleep apnoea; breastfeeding was too, probably due to other factors.

    Breastfeeding, not formula, was associated with OSAS in this sample (likely confounded).

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: low · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Identify OSAS risk factors in children

    How was the study done?

    Cross-sectional with sleep studies

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    1578 children

    What was actually found?

    Adenotonsillar hypertrophy, obesity, male sex, breastfeeding

    How large was the observed effect?

    not reported

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Formula feeding was not identified as the cause of enlarged tonsils.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Confounding; clinic sample

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Does not support the formula claim

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Low

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Causation

    Scientific details →

  • US guideline on tonsil surgery in children

    Mitchell RB et al.. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019 · PMID 30798778 · DOI 10.1177/0194599818801757
    Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    Watchful waiting is recommended unless infections are very frequent; surgery is recommended for documented sleep apnea.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Indications

    How was the study done?

    Guideline

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    n/a

    What was actually found?

    Clear thresholds

    How large was the observed effect?

    n/a

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Not every child needs surgery; some clearly do

    What are the study's limitations?

    US

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Partly aligns

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Similar principles

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Individual decisions

    Scientific details →

Studies with mixed or unclear results (2)

  • Breastfeeding and appendicitis

    Alves JG et al.. Trop Doct 2008 · PMID 18820196 · DOI 10.1258/td.2008.070404
    Case-control studyindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    Children breastfed for longer had appendicitis less often than their siblings in one small study.

    Weak association between less breastfeeding and appendicitis; not causation.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: low · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Test breastfeeding vs appendicitis

    How was the study done?

    Sibling case-control

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    200 cases, 200 siblings

    What was actually found?

    Breastfeeding associated with protection

    How large was the observed effect?

    not reported in abstract

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    A possible link, not proof.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Small; recall; no numbers

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Weak partial support

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Low

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Causation; tonsil/adenoid outcomes

    Scientific details →

  • Benefits of breastfeeding

    Victora CG et al.. Lancet 2016 · PMID 26869575 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7
    Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    Breastfeeding protects children against infections and has other benefits; it is not shown here to prevent tonsil or appendix surgery.

    Breastfeeding protects against infections, but surgical outcomes are not addressed.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Summarise effects of breastfeeding

    How was the study done?

    Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    Global

    What was actually found?

    Fewer infections, other benefits

    How large was the observed effect?

    823,000 deaths preventable per year (modelled)

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Breastfeeding is beneficial; formula is not shown to cause surgery.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Observational evidence; surgery outcomes not covered

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports only the general importance of infant feeding

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Tonsil/adenoid/appendix outcomes

    Scientific details →

Regional context

Germany / EU

Most cited cohorts are Scandinavian (Denmark, Sweden) and directly European; RCTs from the UK and Finland are directly transferable. Guidelines in Europe also emphasize defined indications (not verified here in detail).

Egypt

No Egypt-specific data on rates or outcomes of tonsillectomy, cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, splenectomy or thyroid surgery were identified in this review.

What applies in my country?

General scientific assessment

Unclear / insufficient evidence Unproven: breastfeeding is beneficial, but formula has not been shown to cause the need for tonsil, adenoid or appendix surgery.

The following areas of food safety are relevant to this statement:

  • Veterinary medicines and antibiotics
  • Hormonal growth promoters
  • Contaminants (heavy metals, PFAS, PCBs, dioxins, nitrate)
  • Mycotoxins (mould toxins)
  • Controls, imports, recalls, labelling

Dairy

Choose a country to see the checked information for it.

Limits: legal rules describe what is allowed, not what every single food contains. Measurement data come from samples and are meaningful only together with their method details.

Country of residence or purchase Compare with another country

References

  1. Risk factors of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children.. Xu Z et al.. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020 · PMID 32131901 · DOI 10.1186/s40463-020-0404-1
  2. Clinical Practice Guideline: Tonsillectomy in Children (Update).. Mitchell RB et al.. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019 · PMID 30798778 · DOI 10.1177/0194599818801757
  3. Does breast feeding provide protection against acute appendicitis? A case-control study.. Alves JG et al.. Trop Doct 2008 · PMID 18820196 · DOI 10.1258/td.2008.070404
  4. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect.. Victora CG et al.. Lancet 2016 · PMID 26869575 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7

← Back to overview