Mostly false Certainty of evidence: low provisional C-SOD-14

All carbonated waters of every kind (including unsweetened sparkling water) are harmful and must be avoided.

Conclusion: A blanket ban on plain sparkling water is not supported by evidence.

Original statement

مياه غازية بجميع أنواعها

verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.

Translation

All carbonated waters of every kind (including unsweetened sparkling water) are harmful and must be avoided.

Origin

Source status
Third-party site (unofficial)
Attribution
Third-party site altayybat.com (unofficial; lowest attribution level)
Origin
https://altayybat.com/ar/
Attribution uncertainty
The site states that it is unofficial. Items may not reflect Elawady's own lists.
Claimed mechanism

Carbon dioxide in water disturbs stomach acidity and enzymes (Elawady).

Claimed health effect

Digestive harm.

Population concerned

Everyone

Geographic restriction by Elawady

none found

Diverging source versions

Source status
Archive food list
Attribution
Archive food guide ('Carbonated drinks — Avoid')
Origin
https://eltayebat.com/en/foods/
Attribution uncertainty
Food list without source video.

اخر وصيه ليك اسوا مشروب اخترعه البني ادم على وجه الارض من يوم ما اتخلق لحد النهارده المياه الغازيه

My last advice to you: the worst drink that humans have invented on the face of the earth, from the day they were created until today, is carbonated water.

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
الجن . آلام العمود الفقري . الحقيقه والسراب (Open source)
Published
26 November 2025
Timestamp
0:42:34 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
Attribution uncertainty
Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); no timestamps; wording may contain speech-recognition errors; speaker turns are not marked, the excerpt was judged to be Elawady's own speech from context.

Scientific assessment

Mostly false – Essential parts of the statement are not supported by the evidence or are strongly exaggerated.

Certainty of evidence: low – Further research is likely to change the assessment considerably.

1. What was claimed?

Every carbonated water is harmful.

2. What is demonstrably correct?

Carbonation can cause belching and bloating in some people.

3. What is wrong or exaggerated?

Plain carbonated water contains no sugar or sweetener; the main harms documented for soft drinks (sugar-related) do not apply. Tucker 2006 found no BMD association for non-cola carbonated beverages; Cuomo 2002 found improved dyspepsia and constipation scores with carbonated water vs tap water (small RCT).

4. What remains unclear?

Long-term effects of high intake of plain carbonated water are little studied.

5. Which studies support it?

None.

6. Which studies contradict it?

A-SOD-03, I-SOD-01, I-SOD-02.

7. What applies to Germany and Europe?

Carbonated mineral waters are commonly consumed in Germany; no regulatory health concern was identified in this review.

8. What is known about Egypt?

No Egypt-specific data.

9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?

Unsweetened sparkling water is a reasonable alternative to sugary drinks for people who tolerate it.

Assessment details

Rationale for certainty of evidence

No evidence of harm from plain carbonated water was found; the bone association in Framingham was specific to cola and absent for other carbonated drinks; a small RCT found symptom improvement in dyspepsia; GERD review found no direct harm. Evidence on plain sparkling water is limited.

Source quality

Third-party list wording ('all kinds'); the archive food guide lists 'carbonated drinks' as avoided; Elawady explicitly argues the carbonated water itself is the problem.

Regional transferability

Universal.

Individual exceptions

Some people experience bloating or belching from carbonation and may avoid it.

Regional scope of the claim
general (biological/medical)
Last reviewed
25 October 2026 provisional

In plain language

The system bans all fizzy drinks, including plain sparkling water. No study reviewed here shows that unsweetened sparkling water is harmful. Its problems are at most belching or bloating in some people. One small trial even found it helped indigestion and constipation.

Studies on this claim

Studies supporting the claim (0)

No studies in this group.

Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (3)

  • Cola and bone density in older women

    Tucker KL et al.. Am J Clin Nutr 2006 · PMID 17023723 · DOI 10.1093/ajcn/84.4.936
    Cross-sectional studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked★ key study

    Women drinking cola daily had 3.7% lower hip bone density; other fizzy drinks showed no link.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Is cola consumption associated with lower BMD?

    How was the study done?

    Cross-sectional analysis of BMD (DXA) by FFQ soft-drink frequency, Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    1,413 women; 1,125 men; Older women and men

    What was actually found?

    Women: cola associated with lower BMD at each hip site (P<0.001-0.05) but not spine; daily intake 3.7% lower femoral neck and 5.4% lower Ward's area BMD; similar for diet cola; no association in men or for non-cola carbonated beverages; phosphorus intake not significantly higher in daily cola drinkers.

    How large was the observed effect?

    -3.7% femoral neck BMD (daily vs <1/month)

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Possible small effect on bone in women; not shown for other fizzy drinks.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Cross-sectional; Effect only in women and at hip; Mechanism not demonstrated (phosphorus intake similar); Self-reported intake

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Main evidence for C-SOD-08; also limits C-SOD-14 (no association for non-cola carbonated drinks).

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Moderate.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    That phosphoric acid causes bone loss or fractures.

    Scientific details →

  • Fizzy drinks and reflux: systematic review

    Johnson T et al.. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010 · PMID 20055784 · DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04232.x
    Systematic reviewindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study

    Fizzy drinks briefly lower acidity in the food pipe, but there is no direct evidence that they cause reflux disease.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Do carbonated beverages affect oesophageal pH, motility, damage, GERD symptoms and complications?

    How was the study done?

    Systematic review (qualitative).

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    Not stated in abstract; Not stated in abstract

    What was actually found?

    Very short decline in intra-oesophageal pH; possible transient reduction of LES basal pressure; no evidence of direct oesophageal damage; not consistently shown to cause GERD symptoms; no evidence of GERD complications or oesophageal cancer.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Not pooled

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Fizzy drinks are not a proven cause of reflux disease.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Old (2010); Limited primary evidence; No meta-analysis

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts C-SOD-12, C-SOD-13, C-SOD-14.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    That nobody gets symptoms from them.

    Scientific details →

  • Sparkling water for indigestion

    Cuomo R et al.. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002 · PMID 12352219 · DOI 10.1097/00042737-200209000-00010
    Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    In a small trial, sparkling water improved indigestion and constipation compared with tap water.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: low · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Effect of carbonated water in functional dyspepsia and constipation.

    How was the study done?

    Double-blind randomized trial, ~15 days.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    21 (10 carbonated, 11 tap water); Patients with dyspepsia and secondary constipation

    What was actually found?

    Dyspepsia score 7.9 -> 5.4 with carbonated water (unchanged with tap water); constipation score 16.0 -> 12.1; satiety reduced; gallbladder emptying improved.

    How large was the observed effect?

    Dyspepsia score 7.9 -> 5.4

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Plain sparkling water is not shown to harm digestion.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Very small; Short; Within-group analyses

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts C-SOD-12, C-SOD-14.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    High.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    General benefit.

    Scientific details →

Studies with mixed or unclear results (0)

No studies in this group.

Regional context

Germany / EU

Carbonated mineral waters are commonly consumed in Germany; no regulatory health concern was identified in this review.

Egypt

No Egypt-specific data.

What applies in my country?

General scientific assessment

Mostly false A blanket ban on plain sparkling water is not supported by evidence.

The following areas of food safety are relevant to this statement:

  • Additives and processing

Honey, sugar, sweets

Choose a country to see the checked information for it.

Limits: legal rules describe what is allowed, not what every single food contains. Measurement data come from samples and are meaningful only together with their method details.

Country of residence or purchase Compare with another country

References

  1. Colas, but not other carbonated beverages, are associated with low bone mineral density in older women: The Framingham Osteoporosis Study.. Tucker KL et al.. Am J Clin Nutr 2006 · PMID 17023723 · DOI 10.1093/ajcn/84.4.936
  2. Systematic review: the effects of carbonated beverages on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.. Johnson T et al.. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010 · PMID 20055784 · DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04232.x
  3. Effects of carbonated water on functional dyspepsia and constipation.. Cuomo R et al.. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002 · PMID 12352219 · DOI 10.1097/00042737-200209000-00010

← Back to overview