Cross-sectional studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked★ key study A-SOD-03 in-depth review

Cola and bone density in older women

Colas, but not other carbonated beverages, are associated with low bone mineral density in older women: The Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

Overview

Tucker KL et al.. Am J Clin Nutr 2006 · PMID 17023723 · DOI 10.1093/ajcn/84.4.936

Women drinking cola daily had 3.7% lower hip bone density; other fizzy drinks showed no link.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Is cola consumption associated with lower BMD?

How was the study done?

Cross-sectional analysis of BMD (DXA) by FFQ soft-drink frequency, Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

1,413 women; 1,125 men; Older women and men

What was actually found?

Women: cola associated with lower BMD at each hip site (P<0.001-0.05) but not spine; daily intake 3.7% lower femoral neck and 5.4% lower Ward's area BMD; similar for diet cola; no association in men or for non-cola carbonated beverages; phosphorus intake not significantly higher in daily cola drinkers.

How large was the observed effect?

-3.7% femoral neck BMD (daily vs <1/month)

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Possible small effect on bone in women; not shown for other fizzy drinks.

What are the study's limitations?

Cross-sectional; Effect only in women and at hip; Mechanism not demonstrated (phosphorus intake similar); Self-reported intake

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Main evidence for C-SOD-08; also limits C-SOD-14 (no association for non-cola carbonated drinks).

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Moderate.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

That phosphoric acid causes bone loss or fractures.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Tucker KL, Morita K, Qiao N, Hannan MT, Cupples LA, Kiel DP
Journal
Am J Clin Nutr
Year
2006
Identifier
PMID 17023723 DOI 10.1093/ajcn/84.4.936
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

No COI statement; NIA grant

2. Research question

Is cola consumption associated with lower BMD?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cross-sectional study – Cross-sectional analysis of BMD (DXA) by FFQ soft-drink frequency, Framingham Osteoporosis Study.
Population

Older women and men

Country

USA

Period

Not stated in abstract

Sample size

1,413 women; 1,125 men

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Frequency of cola and other carbonated beverages

Comparator

<1 serving cola/month

Endpoints

BMD at spine and 3 hip sites

Statistical methods

Linear regression adjusted for BMI, height, age, energy, physical activity, smoking, alcohol, calcium, vitamin D, non-cola caffeine, season, menopause, oestrogen

5. Actual results

Results

Women: cola associated with lower BMD at each hip site (P<0.001-0.05) but not spine; daily intake 3.7% lower femoral neck and 5.4% lower Ward's area BMD; similar for diet cola; no association in men or for non-cola carbonated beverages; phosphorus intake not significantly higher in daily cola drinkers.

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Intake of cola, but not of other carbonated soft drinks, is associated with low BMD in women. Additional research is needed.

6. Strengths

  • Measured BMD (DXA)
  • Extensive adjustment

7. Weaknesses

  • Cross-sectional
  • Effect only in women and at hip
  • Mechanism not demonstrated (phosphorus intake similar)
  • Self-reported intake

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Confounding and temporality issues inherent to cross-sectional design.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Differences of 3.7-5.4% in BMD are modest; fracture outcomes not studied.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Main evidence for C-SOD-08; also limits C-SOD-14 (no association for non-cola carbonated drinks).

11. Independent contrary findings

No association in men; I-SOD-07 observational only.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Moderate.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Suggestive association in women; not proof of a bone-draining effect.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)partly correct but over-interpreted

14. Open questions

Fracture risk; mechanism.

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Women who drink cola daily — sugary or diet — have significantly lower hip BMD, independent of age, calcium or vitamin D.

A. What was actually studied?

Association between soft-drink type and BMD.

B. What did the authors find?

Lower hip BMD in women drinking cola; not in men; not for non-cola drinks.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Cola, not other carbonated drinks, associated with low BMD in women; needs confirmation.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

'Phosphoric acid drains bone'.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Numbers correct; the phosphoric-acid mechanism and the causal verb go beyond the data, especially as phosphorus intake was not higher.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
partly correct but over-interpreted