Cross-sectional studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked★ key study A-SOD-03 in-depth review
Cola and bone density in older women
Colas, but not other carbonated beverages, are associated with low bone mineral density in older women: The Framingham Osteoporosis Study.
Overview
Tucker KL et al.. Am J Clin Nutr 2006 · PMID 17023723 · DOI 10.1093/ajcn/84.4.936
Women drinking cola daily had 3.7% lower hip bone density; other fizzy drinks showed no link.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Is cola consumption associated with lower BMD?
- How was the study done?
Cross-sectional analysis of BMD (DXA) by FFQ soft-drink frequency, Framingham Osteoporosis Study.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
1,413 women; 1,125 men; Older women and men
- What was actually found?
Women: cola associated with lower BMD at each hip site (P<0.001-0.05) but not spine; daily intake 3.7% lower femoral neck and 5.4% lower Ward's area BMD; similar for diet cola; no association in men or for non-cola carbonated beverages; phosphorus intake not significantly higher in daily cola drinkers.
- How large was the observed effect?
-3.7% femoral neck BMD (daily vs <1/month)
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Possible small effect on bone in women; not shown for other fizzy drinks.
- What are the study's limitations?
Cross-sectional; Effect only in women and at hip; Mechanism not demonstrated (phosphorus intake similar); Self-reported intake
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Main evidence for C-SOD-08; also limits C-SOD-14 (no association for non-cola carbonated drinks).
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Moderate.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
That phosphoric acid causes bone loss or fractures.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Tucker KL, Morita K, Qiao N, Hannan MT, Cupples LA, Kiel DP
- Journal
- Am J Clin Nutr
- Year
- 2006
- Identifier
- PMID 17023723 DOI 10.1093/ajcn/84.4.936
- Verification
- verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
No COI statement; NIA grant
2. Research question
Is cola consumption associated with lower BMD?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Cross-sectional study – Cross-sectional analysis of BMD (DXA) by FFQ soft-drink frequency, Framingham Osteoporosis Study.
- Population
Older women and men
- Country
USA
- Period
Not stated in abstract
- Sample size
1,413 women; 1,125 men
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
not stated in abstract
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Frequency of cola and other carbonated beverages
- Comparator
<1 serving cola/month
- Endpoints
BMD at spine and 3 hip sites
- Statistical methods
Linear regression adjusted for BMI, height, age, energy, physical activity, smoking, alcohol, calcium, vitamin D, non-cola caffeine, season, menopause, oestrogen
5. Actual results
- Results
Women: cola associated with lower BMD at each hip site (P<0.001-0.05) but not spine; daily intake 3.7% lower femoral neck and 5.4% lower Ward's area BMD; similar for diet cola; no association in men or for non-cola carbonated beverages; phosphorus intake not significantly higher in daily cola drinkers.
- Absolute risks
not applicable
- Authors' conclusion
Intake of cola, but not of other carbonated soft drinks, is associated with low BMD in women. Additional research is needed.
6. Strengths
- Measured BMD (DXA)
- Extensive adjustment
7. Weaknesses
- Cross-sectional
- Effect only in women and at hip
- Mechanism not demonstrated (phosphorus intake similar)
- Self-reported intake
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- ROBINS-E
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Confounding and temporality issues inherent to cross-sectional design.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Differences of 3.7-5.4% in BMD are modest; fracture outcomes not studied.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Main evidence for C-SOD-08; also limits C-SOD-14 (no association for non-cola carbonated drinks).
11. Independent contrary findings
No association in men; I-SOD-07 observational only.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Moderate.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Suggestive association in women; not proof of a bone-draining effect.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | moderate |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | partly replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | mixed |
| Regional transferability | moderate |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | partly correct but over-interpreted |
14. Open questions
Fracture risk; mechanism.
15. Linked fact checks
- Phosphoric acid in cola drains the bones; women who drink cola daily (sugary or diet) have 3.7% lower hip bone density. – Studies with mixed or unclear results
- Elawady: the harm of soda is the carbonated water itself, not the sugar or sweetener; one 300 ml Pepsi delivers more carbon dioxide than the body produces in a whole day, and colas contain sodium bicarbonate that neutralises stomach acid and increases reflux. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim
- All carbonated waters of every kind (including unsweetened sparkling water) are harmful and must be avoided. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim
Use by the Tayebat archive
Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.
- What the archive says about the study
Women who drink cola daily — sugary or diet — have significantly lower hip BMD, independent of age, calcium or vitamin D.
- A. What was actually studied?
Association between soft-drink type and BMD.
- B. What did the authors find?
Lower hip BMD in women drinking cola; not in men; not for non-cola drinks.
- C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?
Cola, not other carbonated drinks, associated with low BMD in women; needs confirmation.
- D. What does the archive derive from it?
'Phosphoric acid drains bone'.
- E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?
Numbers correct; the phosphoric-acid mechanism and the causal verb go beyond the data, especially as phosphorus intake was not higher.
- Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
- partly correct but over-interpreted