False Certainty of evidence: high provisional C-SUP-10

No one needs vitamins or supplements: 'there is no such thing as dietary supplements', the body makes its own vitamins, and vitamins are on the forbidden list.

Safety note: Women who could become pregnant should take folic acid (400–800 µg/day per USPSTF) – stopping it on the basis of this claim raises the risk of neural tube defects. Diagnosed deficiencies (B12, iron, vitamin D) need treatment; untreated B12 deficiency can cause irreversible nerve damage. Children and pregnant women following a diet that excludes many food groups should be assessed by a doctor or dietitian.
Conclusion: False as a universal rule: some supplements are clearly needed in pregnancy, infancy and deficiency.

Original statement

مافيش يا جماعه حاجه اسمها مكملات غذائيه فيش حاجه اسمها مكملات غذائيه انا ما باخدش حاجه خالص انت اصلا مخلوق ما تخدش حاجه | بدوا تطعيمات ملتي فيتامين لتقويه المناعه مافيش حجه ده اسمه عبط ده اسمه عبط لتقويه الغباء وانا كده بشجعه وانا بصراحه ما بشجع العبط حاجه اسمها متيم انا باشا عايش فيتامينات بطلعها بنفسي انا بدي فرصه لجسمي يصنع حاجته بنفسه

verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.

Translation

No one needs vitamins or supplements: 'there is no such thing as dietary supplements', the body makes its own vitamins, and vitamins are on the forbidden list.

Origin

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
السرطان ؟ الأنسولين ؟ المفاصل؟ (Open source)
Published
17 March 2025
Timestamp
not available (transcript has no timings)
Attribution uncertainty
Machine-generated or CC transcript of a live stream; wording may contain transcription errors; context is conversational. original_ar joins separate verbatim passages with ' | '.
Claimed mechanism

A correct diet supplies everything; the body synthesises its needs.

Claimed health effect

No need for any supplement.

Population concerned

Everyone, including pregnant women and children.

Geographic restriction by Elawady

none found

Diverging source versions

بدوا تطعيمات ملتي فيتامين لتقويه المناعه مافيش حجه ده اسمه عبط ده اسمه عبط لتقويه الغباء وانا كده بشجعه وانا بصراحه ما بشجع العبط حاجه اسمها متيم انا باشا عايش فيتامينات بطلعها بنفسي انا بدي فرصه لجسمي يصنع حاجته بنفسه

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr.D Clinics - Diaa Al Awady is live! نوبة النهجان و ضيق النفس (Open source)
Published
19 January 2025
Timestamp
1:00:21 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)

رفضوا رفضوا تناول مكملات الحديد للحامل مع وجود انيميا ممنوع يا استاذه ممنوع مافيش حاجه اسمها مكملات حديد ما فيش حاجه اسمها مكملات النظام الغذائي اللي محتاج مكملات يبقى ناقص

Source status
Video transcript (own words)
Attribution
Elawady (machine transcript)
Video
Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الموت المفاجيء (Open source)
Published
14 July 2025
Timestamp
0:00:06 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)

ممنوع أي أدوية كيميائية: خافض الحرارة، المسكنات، الفيتامينات، المكملات الصناعية، أدوية الحموضة، الأسبرين ويجب استشارة طبيبك الخاص وتحت اشرافه

Source status
Third-party site (unofficial)
Attribution
Third-party site (unofficial by its own statement)
Origin
https://mytayibat.com/forbidden
Attribution uncertainty
Lowest attribution level; the site states it is unofficial.

حذّر بشدة من المكملات الغذائية الفموية، معتبرًا إياها غير ضرورية وقد تضر الكبد، وشدد على أن التغذية السليمة هي الأساس… ويرفض المكملات الغذائية وبروتين مصل اللبن (واي بروتين)، ومكملات الكولاجين والكرياتين والأوميجا 3.

Source status
Archive quote (no location given)
Attribution
Elawady (archive paraphrase; source video not given)
Origin
https://eltayebat.com/rule/oral-supplements/

Scientific assessment

False – The statement contradicts the robust evidence.

Certainty of evidence: high – Further research is very unlikely to change the assessment.

1. What was claimed?

Supplements are never needed; the body makes its own vitamins.

2. What is demonstrably correct?

For well-nourished adults, routine supplements usually add little for disease prevention (see C-SUP-01); multivitamins do not 'boost' immunity in people without deficiency.

3. What is wrong or exaggerated?

There are clear, evidence-based indications: periconceptional folic acid (high certainty), vitamin D for infants/children and at-risk groups, B12 in deficiency (e.g. pernicious anaemia, long-term acid suppression, diets without animal foods), iron in iron-deficiency anaemia. The body cannot produce most vitamins.

4. What remains unclear?

The optimal vitamin D dose for empirical supplementation remains uncertain (Endocrine Society 2024).

5. Which studies support it?

A-SUP-30 and O'Connor 2022 (for healthy non-deficient adults only).

6. Which studies contradict it?

MRC 1991 (I-SUP-01), De-Regil 2015 (I-SUP-02), USPSTF 2023 (I-SUP-03), Endocrine Society 2024 (I-SUP-05), Peña-Rosas 2015 (I-SUP-04).

7. What applies to Germany and Europe?

German recommendations include folic acid before and in early pregnancy and vitamin D prophylaxis for infants (not fetched here).

8. What is known about Egypt?

No Egypt-specific recommendations were reviewed; folic acid and iron in pregnancy are standard WHO-endorsed care.

9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?

Supplements should be targeted: tested deficiency, pregnancy planning, infancy, specific diseases. A blanket ban is unsafe, particularly combined with a diet that excludes many nutrient-rich foods.

Assessment details

Rationale for certainty of evidence

Folic acid before and in early pregnancy prevents neural tube defects (MRC trial: 72% protective effect, RR 0.28; Cochrane: RR 0.31, high-quality evidence; USPSTF 2023 grade A, high certainty). The Endocrine Society 2024 suggests vitamin D supplementation for children and adolescents to prevent rickets and in pregnancy. Vitamin B12 deficiency and iron-deficiency anaemia require supplementation. The human body cannot make most vitamins (exceptions: vitamin D with sunlight, niacin from tryptophan).

Source quality

Video statements, quote and third-party list consistent; contradicted by high-certainty evidence.

Regional transferability

Applies everywhere.

Individual exceptions

People on restrictive diets are at higher risk of deficiencies; the third-party Tayebat food list excludes eggs, most dairy, all poultry, legumes, leafy greens and many vegetables (red meat, lamb liver and wild sea fish are allowed), which strengthens the case for testing, especially in pregnancy and childhood.

Regional scope of the claim
general (biological/medical)
Last reviewed
25 October 2026 provisional

In plain language

It is true that healthy people who eat a varied diet rarely need vitamin pills. But there are important exceptions. Folic acid taken before and in early pregnancy prevents serious birth defects of the spine and brain – this is among the best-proven facts in nutrition. Babies and children may need vitamin D, and people with low B12 or iron need treatment. The body cannot make most vitamins itself.

Studies on this claim

Studies supporting the claim (1)

  • USPSTF 2022: vitamins for prevention

    US Preventive Services Task Force et al.. JAMA 2022 · PMID 35727271 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2022.8970
    Guideline / position statementcited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked★ key study

    Recommends against beta-carotene and vitamin E; evidence insufficient for most others.

    Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Prevention guidance.

    How was the study done?

    Guideline.

    What was actually found?

    D for beta-carotene, vitamin E; I for others.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Don't take for prevention.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Not for pregnancy/deficiency.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Supports.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Applicable.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Advice on deficiency or pregnancy.

    Scientific details →

Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (5)

  • Folic acid prevents spina bifida (MRC trial)

    MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Lancet 1991 · PMID 1677062
    Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study

    Folic acid cut neural tube defects by 72%.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    NTD prevention.

    How was the study done?

    RCT.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    1,817 women.

    What was actually found?

    Fewer NTDs.

    How large was the observed effect?

    RR 0.28.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Folic acid before pregnancy is essential.

    What are the study's limitations?

    High-risk women.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts blanket ban.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Applicable.

    Scientific details →

  • Folic acid and birth defects (Cochrane)

    De-Regil LM et al.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 · PMID 26662928 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD007950.pub3
    Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study

    Folic acid lowered neural tube defects by about 69%.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Folate and birth defects.

    How was the study done?

    Cochrane.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    7,391.

    What was actually found?

    Fewer NTDs.

    How large was the observed effect?

    RR 0.31.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Take folic acid when planning pregnancy.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts C-SUP-10.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Applicable.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Other anomalies.

    Scientific details →

  • USPSTF: folic acid before pregnancy

    US Preventive Services Task Force et al.. JAMA 2023 · PMID 37526713 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2023.12876
    Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    All who could become pregnant should take 400–800 µg folic acid daily (grade A).

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    NTD prevention.

    How was the study done?

    Guideline.

    What was actually found?

    Grade A.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Clear indication for a supplement.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts C-SUP-10.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Applicable.

    Scientific details →

  • Endocrine Society 2024 vitamin D guideline

    Demay MB et al.. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2024 · PMID 38828931 · DOI 10.1210/clinem/dgae290
    Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkabstract only checked

    Suggests vitamin D for children, pregnancy, people ≥75 and high-risk prediabetes.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Vitamin D for prevention.

    How was the study done?

    Guideline.

    What was actually found?

    Group-specific suggestions.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Some groups benefit.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Conditional.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts blanket ban.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Applicable.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Doses.

    Scientific details →

  • Iron in pregnancy (Cochrane)

    Peña-Rosas JP et al.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 · PMID 26198451 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD004736.pub5
    Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study

    Daily iron reduced anaemia at term by 70%.

    Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim

    Original publication · Scientific details

    Study explained simply
    What did the researchers want to find out?

    Iron in pregnancy.

    How was the study done?

    Cochrane.

    How many people, animals or samples were studied?

    43,274 women.

    What was actually found?

    Less anaemia.

    How large was the observed effect?

    RR 0.30.

    What do the results mean in everyday life?

    Iron helps pregnant women.

    What are the study's limitations?

    Low-quality evidence.

    What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

    Contradicts C-SUP-09.

    Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

    Applicable.

    What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

    Birth outcome benefits.

    Scientific details →

Studies with mixed or unclear results (0)

No studies in this group.

Regional context

Germany / EU

German recommendations include folic acid before and in early pregnancy and vitamin D prophylaxis for infants (not fetched here).

Egypt

No Egypt-specific recommendations were reviewed; folic acid and iron in pregnancy are standard WHO-endorsed care.

What applies in my country?

General scientific assessment

False False as a universal rule: some supplements are clearly needed in pregnancy, infancy and deficiency.

This statement concerns biological or medical relationships. The scientific assessment above applies regardless of the country; country-specific food data do not change it.

References

  1. Vitamin, Mineral, and Multivitamin Supplementation to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.. US Preventive Services Task Force et al.. JAMA 2022 · PMID 35727271 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2022.8970
  2. Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group.. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Lancet 1991 · PMID 1677062
  3. Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects.. De-Regil LM et al.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 · PMID 26662928 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD007950.pub3
  4. Folic Acid Supplementation to Prevent Neural Tube Defects: US Preventive Services Task Force Reaffirmation Recommendation Statement.. US Preventive Services Task Force et al.. JAMA 2023 · PMID 37526713 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2023.12876
  5. Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.. Demay MB et al.. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2024 · PMID 38828931 · DOI 10.1210/clinem/dgae290
  6. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.. Peña-Rosas JP et al.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 · PMID 26198451 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD004736.pub5

← Back to overview