Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-SUP-02 in-depth review

Folic acid and birth defects (Cochrane)

Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects.

Overview

De-Regil LM et al.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 · PMID 26662928 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD007950.pub3

Folic acid lowered neural tube defects by about 69%.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Folate and birth defects.

How was the study done?

Cochrane.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

7,391.

What was actually found?

Fewer NTDs.

How large was the observed effect?

RR 0.31.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Take folic acid when planning pregnancy.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts C-SUP-10.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Other anomalies.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
De-Regil LM et al.
Journal
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Year
2015
Identifier
PMID 26662928 DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD007950.pub3
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Luz Maria De‐Regil: I am a full time staff of the Micronutrient Initiative, an International NGO that supports research projects and large scale programmes to improve vitamin and mineral consumption among the most vulnerable populations. Juan Pablo Peña‐Rosas and Pura Rayco‐Solon: The World Health Organization gratefully acknowledges the financial contribution of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Micronutrient Initiative, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the US Agency for International development (USAID), the Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN) and Harvest Plus towards the work in the area of nutrition. Donors do not fund specific guidelines and do not participate in any decision related to the guideline development process, including the composition of research questions, membership of the guideline groups, conduct and interpretation of systematic reviews, or formulation of recommendations. Ana C Fernández‐Gaxiola: none known.

2. Research question

Effects and safety of periconceptional folate supplementation

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Cochrane systematic review of RCTs/quasi-RCTs
Population

Women of reproductive age

Country

Multinational

Period

to Aug 2015

Sample size

5 trials, 7,391 women

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

RCTs

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Daily folic acid (alone or with micronutrients)

Comparator

No intervention/placebo/micronutrients without folate

Endpoints

NTDs, other anomalies, outcomes

Statistical methods

GRADE

5. Actual results

Results

NTDs RR 0.31 (0.17–0.58), 6,708 births, high-quality evidence; recurrence RR 0.34 (0.18–0.64); effect not modified by dose ≥400 µg.

Absolute risks

not reported in abstract excerpt

Authors' conclusion

Folic acid has a protective effect against NTDs.

6. Strengths

  • Cochrane
  • High-quality evidence

7. Weaknesses

  • Only one trial low risk of bias
  • Author COI (NGO)

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
low

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-SUP-10.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

High-certainty benefit.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biaslow
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks