Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-ABX-05 standard review

Early antibiotics and asthma (US)

Antibiotic exposure by 6 months and asthma and allergy at 6 years: Findings in a cohort of 1,401 US children.

Overview

Risnes KR et al.. Am J Epidemiol 2011 · PMID 21190986 · DOI 10.1093/aje/kwq400

Antibiotics before 6 months were linked to asthma at age 6.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Link.

How was the study done?

Cohort.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

1401.

What was actually found?

Association.

How large was the observed effect?

OR 1.52.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Uncertain.

What are the study's limitations?

Small.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Association.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Moderate.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Causation.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Risnes KR, Belanger K, Murk W, Bracken MB
Journal
Am J Epidemiol
Year
2011
Identifier
PMID 21190986 DOI 10.1093/aje/kwq400 · PMC3105273
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections

PubMed lists: ErratumIn (Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr 1;173(7):846), ErratumIn (Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun 15;173(12):1475)

Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract/record (grants: NIAID NIH HHS, NIDA NIH HHS)

2. Research question

Antibiotics by 6 months and asthma/allergy at 6 years

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Prospective cohort
Population

US children

Country

USA

Period

2003-2007

Sample size

1401

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Antibiotics < 6 months

Comparator

Unexposed

Endpoints

Asthma, allergy tests

Statistical methods

Adjusted OR

5. Actual results

Results

Asthma aOR 1.52 (1.07-2.16); no early LRI OR 1.66 (1.12-3.46); allergy test OR 1.59 (1.10-2.28).

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Protopathic bias unlikely to account for main findings.

6. Strengths

  • Addresses protopathic bias

7. Weaknesses

  • Small
  • Two errata

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Wide CIs.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-ABX-06.

11. Independent contrary findings

I-ABX-03.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Moderate.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Association.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Bibliography only.

A. What was actually studied?

Antibiotics and asthma.

B. What did the authors find?

Association.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Protopathic bias unlikely.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Supports link.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Justified as association.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
not applicable