Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-ABX-06 standard review

Antibiotics and asthma (Canada)

Antibiotic use in children is associated with increased risk of asthma.

Overview

Marra F et al.. Pediatrics 2009 · PMID 19255032 · DOI 10.1542/peds.2008-1146

Infant antibiotics were linked to a small increased asthma risk.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Link.

How was the study done?

Cohort.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

251,817.

What was actually found?

Small risk.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Small.

What are the study's limitations?

Confounding.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Association.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Moderate.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Causation.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Marra F, Marra CA, Richardson K, Lynd LD, Kozyrskyj A, Patrick DM, Bowie WR, Fitzgerald JM
Journal
Pediatrics
Year
2009
Identifier
PMID 19255032 DOI 10.1542/peds.2008-1146
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract/record

2. Research question

Antibiotics before 1 year and childhood asthma

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Administrative birth cohort, Cox models
Population

BC births 1997-2003

Country

Canada

Period

1997-2003

Sample size

251,817

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Antibiotics first year

Comparator

Unexposed

Endpoints

Asthma after 24 months

Statistical methods

Cox, extensive adjustment incl. infections

5. Actual results

Results

Small increased risk; dose-response; highest >4 courses (HR values not in abstract).

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Small risk increasing with courses.

6. Strengths

  • Large

7. Weaknesses

  • No sibling control

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-ABX-06.

11. Independent contrary findings

I-ABX-03.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Moderate.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Association.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Bibliography only.

A. What was actually studied?

Antibiotics and asthma.

B. What did the authors find?

Small risk.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Small risk.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Supports link.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Justified as association.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
not applicable