Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-CHK-12 standard review
Meat and lymphoma in Europe
Consumption of meat and dairy and lymphoma risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.
Overview
Rohrmann S et al.. Int J Cancer 2011 · PMID 20473877 · DOI 10.1002/ijc.25387
No overall link; poultry was linked to some lymphoma subtypes, possibly by chance.
Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Are meat and dairy intakes associated with lymphoma risk?
- How was the study done?
Prospective cohort (EPIC)
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
411,097 participants; 1,334 lymphomas; European adults
- What was actually found?
Overall no association with NHL or HL. Poultry per 10 g: B-cell lymphoma RR 1.22 (1.05-1.42), FL 1.65 (1.18-2.32), BCLL 1.54 (1.18-2.01).
- How large was the observed effect?
Cox RR per intake unit
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
An unconfirmed signal.
- What are the study's limitations?
Multiple subgroup tests; Authors note chance plausible
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Weak.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
High.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Cannot show poultry causes lymphoma.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Rohrmann S, Linseisen J, Jakobsen MU, Overvad K, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Tjonneland A, Boutron-Ruault MC, Kaaks R, Becker N, Bergmann M, Boeing H, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ, Key TJ, Travis R, Benetou V, Naska A, Trichopoulou A, Pala V, Tumino R, Masala G, Mattiello A, Brustad M, Lund E, Skeie G, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Peeters PH, Vermeulen RC, Jakszyn P, Dorronsoro M, Barricarte A, Tormo MJ, Molina E, Argüelles M, Melin B, Ericson U, Manjer J, Rinaldi S, Slimani N, Boffetta P, Vergnaud AC, Khan A, Norat T, Vineis P
- Journal
- Int J Cancer
- Year
- 2011
- Identifier
- PMID 20473877 DOI 10.1002/ijc.25387
- Verification
- verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
No COI statement; CRUK, MRC
2. Research question
Are meat and dairy intakes associated with lymphoma risk?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Cohort study – Prospective cohort (EPIC)
- Population
European adults
- Country
10 European countries (EPIC)
- Period
Median follow-up 8.5 years
- Sample size
411,097 participants; 1,334 lymphomas
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
EPIC participants
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Red/processed meat, poultry, milk, dairy
- Comparator
Continuous intake
- Endpoints
NHL, HL and subtypes
- Statistical methods
Cox RR per intake unit
5. Actual results
- Results
Overall no association with NHL or HL. Poultry per 10 g: B-cell lymphoma RR 1.22 (1.05-1.42), FL 1.65 (1.18-2.32), BCLL 1.54 (1.18-2.01).
- Absolute risks
not reported
- Authors' conclusion
Poultry related to increased B-cell lymphoma risk; chance is a plausible explanation; confirmation needed.
6. Strengths
- Large European cohort
7. Weaknesses
- Multiple subgroup tests
- Authors note chance plausible
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- ROBINS-E
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Multiple testing.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Subgroup findings at risk of chance.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
11. Independent contrary findings
No overall association.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
High.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Exploratory signal.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | low |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | not replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | unknown |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Replication.
15. Linked fact checks
Use by the Tayebat archive
Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.
- What the archive says about the study
Listed in bibliography (no interpretation).
- A. What was actually studied?
Meat and lymphoma.
- B. What did the authors find?
No overall association; poultry subgroup signals.
- C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?
Chance is plausible.
- D. What does the archive derive from it?
Implicitly against poultry.
- E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?
Weak: authors themselves say chance is plausible.
- Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
- not applicable