Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-CHK-12 standard review

Meat and lymphoma in Europe

Consumption of meat and dairy and lymphoma risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.

Overview

Rohrmann S et al.. Int J Cancer 2011 · PMID 20473877 · DOI 10.1002/ijc.25387

No overall link; poultry was linked to some lymphoma subtypes, possibly by chance.

Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Are meat and dairy intakes associated with lymphoma risk?

How was the study done?

Prospective cohort (EPIC)

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

411,097 participants; 1,334 lymphomas; European adults

What was actually found?

Overall no association with NHL or HL. Poultry per 10 g: B-cell lymphoma RR 1.22 (1.05-1.42), FL 1.65 (1.18-2.32), BCLL 1.54 (1.18-2.01).

How large was the observed effect?

Cox RR per intake unit

What do the results mean in everyday life?

An unconfirmed signal.

What are the study's limitations?

Multiple subgroup tests; Authors note chance plausible

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Weak.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot show poultry causes lymphoma.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Rohrmann S, Linseisen J, Jakobsen MU, Overvad K, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Tjonneland A, Boutron-Ruault MC, Kaaks R, Becker N, Bergmann M, Boeing H, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ, Key TJ, Travis R, Benetou V, Naska A, Trichopoulou A, Pala V, Tumino R, Masala G, Mattiello A, Brustad M, Lund E, Skeie G, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Peeters PH, Vermeulen RC, Jakszyn P, Dorronsoro M, Barricarte A, Tormo MJ, Molina E, Argüelles M, Melin B, Ericson U, Manjer J, Rinaldi S, Slimani N, Boffetta P, Vergnaud AC, Khan A, Norat T, Vineis P
Journal
Int J Cancer
Year
2011
Identifier
PMID 20473877 DOI 10.1002/ijc.25387
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

No COI statement; CRUK, MRC

2. Research question

Are meat and dairy intakes associated with lymphoma risk?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Prospective cohort (EPIC)
Population

European adults

Country

10 European countries (EPIC)

Period

Median follow-up 8.5 years

Sample size

411,097 participants; 1,334 lymphomas

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

EPIC participants

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Red/processed meat, poultry, milk, dairy

Comparator

Continuous intake

Endpoints

NHL, HL and subtypes

Statistical methods

Cox RR per intake unit

5. Actual results

Results

Overall no association with NHL or HL. Poultry per 10 g: B-cell lymphoma RR 1.22 (1.05-1.42), FL 1.65 (1.18-2.32), BCLL 1.54 (1.18-2.01).

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Poultry related to increased B-cell lymphoma risk; chance is a plausible explanation; confirmation needed.

6. Strengths

  • Large European cohort

7. Weaknesses

  • Multiple subgroup tests
  • Authors note chance plausible

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Multiple testing.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Subgroup findings at risk of chance.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-CHK-01.

11. Independent contrary findings

No overall association.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Exploratory signal.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitynot replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceunknown
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Replication.

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Listed in bibliography (no interpretation).

A. What was actually studied?

Meat and lymphoma.

B. What did the authors find?

No overall association; poultry subgroup signals.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Chance is plausible.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Implicitly against poultry.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Weak: authors themselves say chance is plausible.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
not applicable