Cross-sectional studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked★ key study A-CHM-13 in-depth review

Cisplatin chemotherapy causes dose-dependent permanent hearing loss

Comprehensive Audiometric Analysis of Hearing Impairment and Tinnitus After Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Survivors of Adult-Onset Cancer.

Overview

Frisina RD et al.. J Clin Oncol 2016 · PMID 27354478 · DOI 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.8822

Almost 1 in 5 testicular-cancer survivors had severe-to-profound hearing loss; 40% had tinnitus.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Measure hearing after cisplatin.

How was the study done?

Audiometry in survivors.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

488 men.

What was actually found?

3.2 dB per 100 mg/m2.

How large was the observed effect?

18% severe-profound loss.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Hearing checks after cisplatin.

What are the study's limitations?

Cross-sectional.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

That cisplatin should be avoided in curable testicular cancer.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Frisina RD, Wheeler HE, Fossa SD, Kerns SL, Fung C, Sesso HD, Monahan PO, Feldman DR, Hamilton R, Vaughn DJ, Beard CJ, Budnick A, Johnson EM, Ardeshir-Rouhani-Fard S, Einhorn LH, Lipshultz SE, Dolan ME, Travis LB
Journal
J Clin Oncol
Year
2016
Identifier
PMID 27354478 DOI 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.8822 · PMC5019759
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found in the article online at www.jco.org. Author contributions are found at the end of this article. | Grants: NCATS NIH HHS, NCI NIH HHS

2. Research question

Dose-response between cumulative cisplatin and hearing loss/tinnitus.

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cross-sectional study – Cross-sectional audiometric study within a survivor cohort
Population

North American male germ-cell tumour survivors

Country

USA/Canada

Period

not stated in abstract

Sample size

488

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Cisplatin-treated GCT survivors

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Cumulative cisplatin (median 400 mg/m2; range 200-800)

Comparator

Lower doses; age/sex-matched normative data

Endpoints

Audiometric thresholds 0.25-12 kHz; tinnitus

Statistical methods

Regression; odds ratios

5. Actual results

Results

Each 100 mg/m2 increase -> 3.2 dB worse age-adjusted threshold (4-12 kHz; P<.001). >300 mg/m2: OR 1.59 for greater ASHA severity (P=.0066). 18% severe-to-profound hearing loss. Tinnitus 40%, correlated with reduced hearing. Hypertension associated with worse hearing.

Absolute risks

18% severe-to-profound hearing loss; 40% tinnitus

Authors' conclusion

Survivors given cisplatin need hearing follow-up, audiology referral and hypertension control.

6. Strengths

  • Comprehensive audiometry
  • Dose-response

7. Weaknesses

  • Cross-sectional
  • Single cancer type, men only

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

No pre-treatment audiograms in abstract.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Clear dose-response; prevalence specific to GCT protocols.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Core evidence for cisplatin ototoxicity.

11. Independent contrary findings

A-CHM-14: testicular cancer 10-year relative survival 95% (benefit).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Correctly quoted except for the Arabic 'single dose' addition.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)partly correct but over-interpreted

14. Open questions

Otoprotection (e.g., in children) not addressed here.

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Frisina 2016: 3.2 dB per 100 mg/m2; 18% severe-to-profound hearing loss; tinnitus 40%. AR headline adds 'high rates even after a single dose'.

A. What was actually studied?

Hearing after cisplatin.

B. What did the authors find?

Dose-dependent permanent hearing loss.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Routine hearing follow-up.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Permanent ototoxicity.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Numbers correct. The Arabic headline claim about high rates 'even after a single dose' is not supported by the abstract (cumulative doses 200-800 mg/m2).

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
partly correct but over-interpreted