Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-ODD-15 standard review

Stomach and bowel side effects of weight-loss injections

Risk of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Associated With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Weight Loss.

Overview

Sodhi M et al.. JAMA 2023 · PMID 37796527 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2023.19574

Not verified (no abstract).

Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: low

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

GI adverse events with GLP-1 RAs used for weight loss (per title)

How was the study done?

Research letter; retrospective cohort (no abstract in PubMed; full text could not be retrieved)

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

not verifiable; not verifiable

What was actually found?

Not verified.

How large was the observed effect?

not verified

What do the results mean in everyday life?

GI side effects are common with GLP-1 RAs (RCTs).

What are the study's limitations?

Not read

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Background for C-ODD-04.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

unknown

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Anything quantitative.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Sodhi M, Rezaeianzadeh R, Kezouh A, Etminan M
Journal
JAMA
Year
2023
Identifier
PMID 37796527 DOI 10.1001/jama.2023.19574 · PMC10557026
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

GI adverse events with GLP-1 RAs used for weight loss (per title)

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Research letter; retrospective cohort (no abstract in PubMed; full text could not be retrieved)
Population

not verifiable

Country

not verifiable

Period

not verifiable

Sample size

not verifiable

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

As described in the abstract; details not available in abstract.

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

GLP-1 receptor agonists for weight loss

Comparator

not verifiable

Endpoints

Gastrointestinal adverse events (per title)

Statistical methods

not verifiable

5. Actual results

Results

No abstract; numbers not verified.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Not verifiable from the record.

6. Strengths

  • Published in JAMA

7. Weaknesses

  • Not read

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Not read.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

not assessable

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Background for C-ODD-04.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

unknown

13. Overall methodological judgement

Not assessed.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitylow
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceunknown
Regional transferabilityunknown
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not verifiable

14. Open questions

None beyond those stated.

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Listed in the archive bibliography for 'oral-diabetes-drugs' without its own interpretation; used as support for the claim that every drug class carries documented harm. The archive summary mentions gastroparesis.

A. What was actually studied?

GI adverse events with GLP-1 RAs used for weight loss (per title)

B. What did the authors find?

Not verified.

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Not verifiable from the record.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Support for 'gastroparesis' harm of GLP-1 RAs.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

Not verifiable in this audit; GI adverse effects of GLP-1 RAs are well known from RCTs (I-ODD-07).

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
not verifiable