Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-ORG-17 standard review
Denmark: heart and lung risks after spleen removal
Risk of cardiovascular events and pulmonary hypertension following splenectomy - a Danish population-based cohort study from 1996-2012.
Overview
Rørholt M et al.. Haematologica 2017 · PMID 28572164 · DOI 10.3324/haematol.2016.157008
Compared with patients with the same diseases, only stroke risk stayed higher; heart attack risk was explained by the underlying disease.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
CV risk
- How was the study done?
Cohort with disease-matched controls
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
~70,000
- What was actually found?
Stroke HR 1.56
- How large was the observed effect?
HR 1.56
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Some but not all risks are due to the operation
- What are the study's limitations?
5 years
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Limits claim
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
European
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Long-term
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Rørholt M, Ghanima W, Farkas DK, Nørgaard M
- Journal
- Haematologica
- Year
- 2017
- Identifier
- PMID 28572164 DOI 10.3324/haematol.2016.157008 · PMC5541868
- Verification
- verified (PMID in archive was wrong, corrected) – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
COI: not stated in record | Grants: none listed
2. Research question
CV events and pulmonary hypertension after splenectomy
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Cohort study – Population-based cohort with general-population and disease-matched comparison cohorts
- Population
Danish splenectomized patients
- Country
Denmark
- Period
1996-2012
- Sample size
5306 splenectomized; 53,060 population; 11,651 disease-matched
4. Methods and endpoints
5. Actual results
- Results
vs population: MI HR 1.24 (1.01-1.52); PH HR 3.25; stroke HR 2.04. vs disease-matched: only stroke elevated HR 1.56 (1.26-1.92). Underlying diseases explained MI and PH risk.
- Absolute risks
not reported
- Authors' conclusion
Splenectomized patients at increased stroke risk; underlying diseases explained increased MI and PH.
6. Strengths
- Disease-matched comparison addresses confounding
7. Weaknesses
- 5-year follow-up
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- ROBINS-E
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- low
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Limits C-ORG-13.
11. Independent contrary findings
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
European.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Methodologically strongest splenectomy study in the bibliography; limits archive claim.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified (PMID in archive was wrong, corrected) |
| Methodological quality | high |
| Risk of bias | low |
| Precision of results | moderate |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | unknown |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
15. Linked fact checks
- Splenectomy raises the risk of venous thrombosis, cardiovascular events and cancer well beyond the first decade after surgery. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim
- Long-term registry data link removal of tonsils, appendix, gallbladder, uterus, ovaries and spleen to higher rates of respiratory disease, autoimmunity, cardiovascular events, gastrointestinal cancers and dementia; each organ does work the body never fully replaces. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim
Use by the Tayebat archive
Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.
- What the archive says about the study
Listed in the archive bibliography only; the archive gives no specific interpretation.
- A. What was actually studied?
CV risk after splenectomy
- B. What did the authors find?
Stroke only after disease-matching
- C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?
Underlying disease explains MI/PH
- D. What does the archive derive from it?
Not used in narrative.
- E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?
This archive-cited study shows that part of the splenectomy 'risk' is due to underlying disease; the narrative omits this. Archive PMID was wrong (pointed to a moyamoya case report); corrected in register.
- Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
- not applicable