Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-ORG-17 standard review

Denmark: heart and lung risks after spleen removal

Risk of cardiovascular events and pulmonary hypertension following splenectomy - a Danish population-based cohort study from 1996-2012.

Overview

Rørholt M et al.. Haematologica 2017 · PMID 28572164 · DOI 10.3324/haematol.2016.157008

Compared with patients with the same diseases, only stroke risk stayed higher; heart attack risk was explained by the underlying disease.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

CV risk

How was the study done?

Cohort with disease-matched controls

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

~70,000

What was actually found?

Stroke HR 1.56

How large was the observed effect?

HR 1.56

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Some but not all risks are due to the operation

What are the study's limitations?

5 years

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Limits claim

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

European

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Long-term

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Rørholt M, Ghanima W, Farkas DK, Nørgaard M
Journal
Haematologica
Year
2017
Identifier
PMID 28572164 DOI 10.3324/haematol.2016.157008 · PMC5541868
Verification
verified (PMID in archive was wrong, corrected) – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

COI: not stated in record | Grants: none listed

2. Research question

CV events and pulmonary hypertension after splenectomy

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Population-based cohort with general-population and disease-matched comparison cohorts
Population

Danish splenectomized patients

Country

Denmark

Period

1996-2012

Sample size

5306 splenectomized; 53,060 population; 11,651 disease-matched

4. Methods and endpoints

5. Actual results

Results

vs population: MI HR 1.24 (1.01-1.52); PH HR 3.25; stroke HR 2.04. vs disease-matched: only stroke elevated HR 1.56 (1.26-1.92). Underlying diseases explained MI and PH risk.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Splenectomized patients at increased stroke risk; underlying diseases explained increased MI and PH.

6. Strengths

  • Disease-matched comparison addresses confounding

7. Weaknesses

  • 5-year follow-up

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
low

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Limits C-ORG-13.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

European.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Methodologically strongest splenectomy study in the bibliography; limits archive claim.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified (PMID in archive was wrong, corrected)
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biaslow
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Listed in the archive bibliography only; the archive gives no specific interpretation.

A. What was actually studied?

CV risk after splenectomy

B. What did the authors find?

Stroke only after disease-matching

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

Underlying disease explains MI/PH

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Not used in narrative.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

This archive-cited study shows that part of the splenectomy 'risk' is due to underlying disease; the narrative omits this. Archive PMID was wrong (pointed to a moyamoya case report); corrected in register.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
not applicable