Cohort studycited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checked A-SUP-16 standard review

Vitamin A and hip fractures

Vitamin A intake and hip fractures among postmenopausal women.

Overview

Feskanich D et al.. JAMA 2002 · PMID 11754708 · DOI 10.1001/jama.287.1.47

Women with the highest retinol intake had about 1.9 times the risk of hip fracture.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Retinol and fractures.

How was the study done?

Cohort.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

72,337.

What was actually found?

More fractures with high retinol.

How large was the observed effect?

RR 1.89.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Avoid high retinol.

What are the study's limitations?

Observational.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly supports.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Causation.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Feskanich D, Singh V, Willett WC, Colditz GA
Journal
JAMA
Year
2002
Identifier
PMID 11754708 DOI 10.1001/jama.287.1.47
Verification
verified – PubMed E-utilities efetch, 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract; grants: NCI NIH HHS

2. Research question

High vitamin A intake and hip fracture

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Prospective cohort (Nurses' Health Study)
Population

Postmenopausal women

Country

USA

Period

1980–1998

Sample size

72,337 (603 fractures)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

see abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Vitamin A (retinol) intake from food and supplements

Comparator

Lowest quintile

Endpoints

Low/moderate-trauma hip fracture

Statistical methods

RR by quintile

5. Actual results

Results

Highest total vitamin A RR 1.48 (1.05–2.07); retinol RR 1.89 (1.33–2.68); beta-carotene n.s.; vitamin A supplement RR 1.40 (0.99–1.99, n.s.).

Absolute risks

not reported in abstract

Authors' conclusion

High retinol intake may promote osteoporotic hip fractures.

6. Strengths

  • Long follow-up
  • Repeated diet assessment

7. Weaknesses

  • Observational
  • FFQ measurement error

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Confounding possible.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

See results.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-SUP-07.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High: biology and trial populations comparable to European adults.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Observational signal for retinol.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)partly correct but over-interpreted

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks

Use by the Tayebat archive

Note: according to the archive, the studies were compiled by the archive operators. Whether Dr. Elawady himself cited this study is not established.

What the archive says about the study

Listed in the archive bibliography of the oral-supplements rule without its own interpretation; used implicitly to support the rule summary that supplements 'failed or caused harm' in large trials.

A. What was actually studied?

High vitamin A intake and hip fracture

B. What did the authors find?

Highest total vitamin A RR 1.48 (1.05–2.07); retinol RR 1.89 (1.33–2.68); beta-carotene n.s.; vitamin A supplement RR 1.40 (0.99–1.99, n.s.).

C. What conclusions do the authors themselves draw?

High retinol intake may promote osteoporotic hip fractures.

D. What does the archive derive from it?

Supports 'more hip fractures'.

E. Is this derivation scientifically justified?

As association; the supplement-specific estimate was not significant.

Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)
partly correct but over-interpreted