Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-ABX-110 standard review

Antibiotics in babies linked to very slightly higher weight at age 5

Early Antibiotic Exposure and Weight Outcomes in Young Children.

Overview

Block JP et al.. Pediatrics 2018 · PMID 30381474 · DOI 10.1542/peds.2018-0290

Children given antibiotics before age 2 were very slightly heavier at age 5.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Check whether early antibiotics relate to weight at 5

How was the study done?

Health-record cohort

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

362,550 children

What was actually found?

Very slightly higher weight

How large was the observed effect?

BMI z +0.04; OR 1.05

What do the results mean in everyday life?

The difference is tiny for an individual child

What are the study's limitations?

Cannot separate effect of infections

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports a small association, not a large causal effect

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Moderate

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Whether antibiotics cause the difference

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Block JP et al.
Journal
Pediatrics
Year
2018
Identifier
PMID 30381474 DOI 10.1542/peds.2018-0290
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref
Retracted
no
Corrections

ErratumIn Pediatrics 2019;143(2):e20183555 (PubMed); erratum content not reviewed; no retraction

Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

One collaborator advisory/consultant relationships with Merck and Pfizer; funded by PCORI and NIH (PubMed record).

2. Research question

Is antibiotic use before 24 months associated with weight outcomes at 5 years?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Multicentre retrospective cohort (PCORnet electronic health records)
Population

Children with same-day height and weight measurements, 35 US institutions

Country

USA

Period

2009-2016

Sample size

362,550

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Measurements at 0-<12, 12-<30 and 48-<72 months

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Any antibiotic use <24 months

Comparator

No antibiotics

Endpoints

BMI z-score and overweight/obesity at about 5 years

Statistical methods

Adjusted regression

5. Actual results

Results

58% received >=1 antibiotic <24 months; 28% overweight/obese at 5 years. Children without complex chronic conditions: BMI z-score +0.04 (95% CI 0.03-0.05); OR overweight/obesity 1.05 (1.03-1.07) for any vs no antibiotics.

Absolute risks

OR 1.05 at 28% prevalence = about 1 percentage point (recalculated, approximate)

Authors' conclusion

Antibiotic use at <24 months was associated with a slightly higher body weight at 5 years.

6. Strengths

  • Very large
  • Measured height and weight

7. Weaknesses

  • Observational; confounding by indication (infections) not removed
  • Small effect

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Residual confounding by infections and family factors possible.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Statistically precise but clinically very small effect (BMI z +0.04).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Largest single cohort: a real but very small association.

11. Independent contrary findings

Effect size argues against 'the boy gets fat'.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Moderate.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports only a tiny association, not a clinically important causal effect.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Causality.

15. Linked fact checks