Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-ABX-119 standard review

Infant antibiotics linked to later IBD, not explained by infections

Early-Life Infections, Antibiotics and Later Risk of Childhood and Early Adult-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pooled Analysis of Two Scandinavian Birth Cohorts.

Overview

Mårild K et al.. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2025 · PMID 39450871 · DOI 10.1111/apt.18358

Antibiotics in the first year were linked to 33% higher relative risk of IBD after accounting for infections.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Separate effects of infections and antibiotics on IBD

How was the study done?

Two birth cohorts

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

103,046 children

What was actually found?

Antibiotics, not infections, linked to IBD

How large was the observed effect?

aHR 1.33 (1.01-1.76)

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Possible modest effect

What are the study's limitations?

Few cases

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports a possible effect, not a doubling

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Proof of cause

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Mårild K et al.
Journal
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
Year
2025
Identifier
PMID 39450871 DOI 10.1111/apt.18358
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Swedish and Norwegian research funds (record); authors declare no conflicts.

2. Research question

Are early-life infections and antibiotics associated with IBD, independent of infection frequency?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Pooled analysis of two prospective birth cohorts
Population

Children followed from birth (ABIS Sweden, MoBa Norway)

Country

Sweden, Norway

Period

Births 1997-2009, follow-up to 2021

Sample size

103,046 children; 395 IBD cases

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Questionnaire data to age 3; IBD from registries

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Antibiotics to age 3

Comparator

No antibiotics

Endpoints

IBD, CD, UC

Statistical methods

Cohort-specific Cox, random-effects pooling

5. Actual results

Results

Infection frequency not associated with IBD (aHR 1.01 per infection). Adjusted for infections, any vs no antibiotics in first year aHR 1.33 (95% CI 1.01-1.76); per additional course 1.17 (0.96-1.44), penicillin per course 1.28 (1.02-1.60); non-penicillin at 1-<3 years and UC per course aHR 1.95 (1.38-2.75).

Absolute risks

395 cases in 1,663,898 person-years

Authors' conclusion

Early-life antibiotic use was a significant risk factor for childhood and early adult-onset IBD, independent of infection frequency.

6. Strengths

  • Prospective
  • Adjusts for infection frequency

7. Weaknesses

  • Few cases; wide CIs
  • Parent-reported exposures

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Partially addresses confounding by indication.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Borderline precision.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Addresses the key alternative explanation (infections).

11. Independent contrary findings

Imprecise.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High (Scandinavian).

13. Overall methodological judgement

Adds support for a possible effect; magnitude modest (HR 1.33).

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Causality.

15. Linked fact checks