Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-ABX-127 standard review

Very long antibiotic use slightly linked to breast cancer in Korea

Association between Antibiotic Use and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in South Korea.

Overview

Hong J et al.. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2025 · PMID 39648494 · DOI 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0154

Women with over a year of total antibiotic use had a 15% higher relative risk.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Check antibiotic use and breast cancer in Korea

How was the study done?

National cohort

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

4.1 million women

What was actually found?

Small increase with long use

How large was the observed effect?

aHR 1.15

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Small; may reflect other factors

What are the study's limitations?

Observational

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Weakly supports an association

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Low

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cause and effect

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Hong J et al.
Journal
Cancer Prev Res (Phila)
Year
2025
Identifier
PMID 39648494 DOI 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0154
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

National Research Foundation of Korea and Korea Medical Institute (record).

2. Research question

Is antibiotic use associated with breast cancer in Asian women?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Nationwide retrospective cohort
Population

Women in the Korean National Health Insurance database

Country

South Korea

Period

2007-2019

Sample size

4,097,812 women

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

National insurance data

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Cumulative days and number of classes of antibiotics

Comparator

Non-users

Endpoints

Incident breast cancer

Statistical methods

Cox regression

5. Actual results

Results

>365 days of use aHR 1.15 (95% CI 1.09-1.21); >=5 classes aHR 1.11 (1.05-1.17); cephalosporins aHR 1.09 (1.02-1.17); lincosamides aHR 1.70 (1.20-2.42).

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Long-term use may be associated with higher breast cancer risk; residual confounding must be addressed.

6. Strengths

  • Very large
  • Duration-response

7. Weaknesses

  • Residual confounding (healthcare use, detection)
  • Small effect

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Detection bias and confounding possible.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Small relative risk at very long cumulative use.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Recent supportive data with small effects.

11. Independent contrary findings

Authors call for confirmation of causality.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Low-moderate (Asian population).

13. Overall methodological judgement

Weak support for an association at very high cumulative use.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceinconsistent
Regional transferabilitylow
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Causality.

15. Linked fact checks