Cross-sectional studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-CHM-126 standard review

Traditional medicine use by children with cancer in Southern Egypt

Family strategies for managing childhood cancer: Using traditional and complementary medicine in Southern Egypt.

Overview

Farrag A et al.. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2024 · PMID 39289855 · DOI 10.1002/pbc.31326

60% of families used traditional or complementary remedies; some used them instead of treatment and some came late.

Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: low

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Describe traditional medicine use

How was the study done?

Interview survey

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

86 children

What was actually found?

Common use; some delays

How large was the observed effect?

60.5% use; 11.5% of users delayed

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Doctors should ask families about remedies

What are the study's limitations?

Small, no outcomes

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Shows the risk is real in Egypt

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot show the effect on survival

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Farrag A et al.
Journal
Pediatr Blood Cancer
Year
2024
Identifier
PMID 39289855 DOI 10.1002/pbc.31326
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 (PublicationType and CommentsCorrections checked); Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Non-US-government support; COI not stated in abstract.

2. Research question

How common is traditional and complementary medicine use among children with cancer in Southern Egypt, and does it delay care?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cross-sectional study – Cross-sectional interview survey
Population

Children with cancer and caregivers at the South Egypt Cancer Institute

Country

Egypt

Period

Not stated in abstract

Sample size

86

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Eligible children and caregivers (response rate 86%)

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Traditional and complementary medicine use

Comparator

Non-users

Endpoints

Prevalence, types, reasons, disclosure, delays

Statistical methods

Descriptive statistics; chi-square

5. Actual results

Results

T&CM use 52/86 (60.5%); 6 users (11.5%) had delayed presentation; used as complement by 71% and as alternative by 29%; herbal 63%, nutritional 33%, witchcraft 29%, religious 19%; 98% said providers did not ask about T&CM; more common in wealthier families (p=.023).

Absolute risks

11.5% of users had delayed presentation

Authors' conclusion

T&CM use is common; providers should discuss it early with families.

6. Strengths

  • Egyptian data
  • Interviewer-administered

7. Weaknesses

  • Small single-centre sample
  • No outcome data

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
high
Rationale

Small cross-sectional survey; descriptive only.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Percentages from counts.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Regional context: alternative and nutritional approaches are widely used by Egyptian families of children with cancer, sometimes as alternatives and with delays. It shows the practical relevance of the safety note; it does not measure survival.

11. Independent contrary findings

None.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Egypt-specific.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Context only.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitylow
Risk of biashigh
Precision of resultslow
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceunknown
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Outcomes of alternative-only use in Egypt.

15. Linked fact checks