Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-DRY-108 in-depth review

Men eating more dairy had more prostate cancer in a large Adventist cohort

Dairy foods, calcium intakes, and risk of incident prostate cancer in Adventist Health Study-2.

Overview

Orlich MJ et al.. Am J Clin Nutr 2022 · PMID 35672028 · DOI 10.1093/ajcn/nqac093

About 27% higher risk at 430 g/day v 20 g/day; also for advanced cancer.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Check dairy and prostate cancer where many eat no dairy.

How was the study done?

Prospective cohort.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

28,737 men.

What was actually found?

Higher dairy, higher risk; non-dairy calcium no link.

How large was the observed effect?

HR 1.27 (1.12-1.43).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Very high dairy may modestly raise prostate cancer risk.

What are the study's limitations?

Observational; screening differences possible.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports the claim as an association.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot prove dairy causes prostate cancer or distinguish milk from cheese.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Orlich MJ et al.
Journal
Am J Clin Nutr
Year
2022
Identifier
PMID 35672028 DOI 10.1093/ajcn/nqac093
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

NCI grant (record); COI not stated in abstract.

2. Research question

Are dairy foods and calcium associated with incident prostate cancer in a cohort with many low/no-dairy consumers?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Prospective cohort with calibration substudy (repeated 24-h recalls) and regression calibration
Population

Seventh-day Adventist men, USA and Canada (6389 Black men)

Country

USA/Canada

Period

mean 7.8 y follow-up

Sample size

28,737 men; 1254 cases (190 advanced)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

AHS-2 male participants

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Dairy foods (g/d), dairy and non-dairy calcium

Comparator

10th percentile (20.2 g/d) or zero intake

Endpoints

Incident prostate cancer, advanced and non-advanced

Statistical methods

Multivariable proportional hazards; regression calibration

5. Actual results

Results

90th (430 g/d) v 10th percentile (20.2 g/d): HR 1.27 (1.12-1.43); advanced 1.38 (1.02-1.88); non-advanced 1.27 (1.11-1.45); Black participants 1.24 (0.98-1.58); excluding vegans 1.22 (1.03-1.43); calibrated HR 1.75 (1.32-2.32); 90th percentile v zero 1.62 (1.26-2.05). Non-dairy calcium not associated: 1.16 (0.94-1.44). Associations non-linear, steepest at low doses.

Absolute risks

Not reported; crude cohort incidence 5.6 per 1000 person-years; applying HR 1.27 gives roughly 15 extra cases per 1000 men over 10 years (approximation, stats/C-DRY-04_prostate.py).

Authors' conclusion

Men with higher intake of dairy foods, but not non-dairy calcium, had a higher risk of prostate cancer.

6. Strengths

  • Wide intake range including zero dairy
  • Measurement-error calibration
  • Advanced cancer analysed

7. Weaknesses

  • Observational
  • Health-conscious population
  • PSA screening/detection bias possible
  • Dairy types not separated in abstract

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Residual confounding and detection bias possible.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Moderate relative association; non-linear; calibrated estimate larger. CIs log-symmetric.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

The strongest recent cohort supporting a dairy-prostate cancer association, including advanced cancer.

11. Independent contrary findings

MR (I-DRY-109) did not find a causal effect overall; WCRF rates the evidence as limited (I-DRY-102).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

North American; biologically transferable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Strengthens the association; causality still unproven.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Which dairy component; causality.

15. Linked fact checks