Risk assessmentindependent cross-checkabstract only checked I-DRY-16 standard review
Mould toxin found in Middle-East milk, including Egypt
The prevalence of aflatoxin M1 in milk of Middle East region: A systematic review, meta-analysis and probabilistic health risk assessment.
Overview
Rahmani J et al.. Food Chem Toxicol 2018 · PMID 29902498 · DOI 10.1016/j.fct.2018.06.016
Egyptian raw milk: 38% of samples positive; estimated hazard index 0.84 for children.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
AFM1 in regional milk.
- How was the study done?
Meta-analysis + risk model.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
49 studies.
- What was actually found?
Contamination common; limits sometimes exceeded.
- How large was the observed effect?
Egypt HI 0.18 adults / 0.84 children.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Food control matters.
- What are the study's limitations?
Model-based.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Partly supports residue concerns.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Low for EU.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
That milk itself is harmful.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Rahmani J et al.
- Journal
- Food Chem Toxicol
- Year
- 2018
- Identifier
- PMID 29902498 DOI 10.1016/j.fct.2018.06.016
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
not stated in abstract
2. Research question
Prevalence/concentration of AFM1 in Middle-East cow milk and carcinogenic risk.
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Risk assessment – Systematic review, meta-analysis and probabilistic risk assessment (Monte Carlo) of aflatoxin M1 in milk.
- Population
Milk samples from Middle-East countries
- Country
Middle East incl. Egypt
- Period
1995-Dec 2017
- Sample size
49 articles; 7,484 data
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Studies on AFM1 in cow milk.
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
AFM1 in raw, pasteurised, UHT milk
- Comparator
EC limit 50 ng/kg
- Endpoints
Concentration, prevalence, hazard index.
- Statistical methods
Meta-analysis; Monte Carlo simulation.
5. Actual results
- Results
Pooled AFM1: UHT 82.57 ng/kg > raw 60.37 > pasteurised 45.81; raw and UHT above EC limit. Raw milk prevalence: Egypt 38%. Hazard index raw milk adults: Egypt 0.18; children: Egypt 0.84; children in several countries HI >1.
- Absolute risks
not reported (hazard index)
- Authors' conclusion
Unlike adults, children in several Middle-East countries are at considerable cancer risk from AFM1 in milk.
6. Strengths
- Regional synthesis including Egypt
7. Weaknesses
- Heterogeneous sampling
- Hazard-index approach for a genotoxic carcinogen is debatable
- Cheese not assessed
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- ROBIS
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Abstract-level judgement.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Estimates are exposure-model outputs, not observed disease.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Mixed for C-DRY-01: contamination is real but concerns feed control, not 'milk = blood'.
11. Independent contrary findings
n/a
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Low (EU limits enforced).
13. Overall methodological judgement
Real regional contamination issue.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | low |
| Directness | indirect |
| Reproducibility | partly replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | mixed |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Current Egyptian data; cheese and butter levels.
15. Linked fact checks
- Milk is a 'substitute for blood' and carries every hormone, pesticide and antibiotic the animal received; therefore milk must be avoided. – Studies with mixed or unclear results