Risk assessmentindependent cross-checkabstract only checked I-DRY-16 standard review

Mould toxin found in Middle-East milk, including Egypt

The prevalence of aflatoxin M1 in milk of Middle East region: A systematic review, meta-analysis and probabilistic health risk assessment.

Overview

Rahmani J et al.. Food Chem Toxicol 2018 · PMID 29902498 · DOI 10.1016/j.fct.2018.06.016

Egyptian raw milk: 38% of samples positive; estimated hazard index 0.84 for children.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

AFM1 in regional milk.

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis + risk model.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

49 studies.

What was actually found?

Contamination common; limits sometimes exceeded.

How large was the observed effect?

Egypt HI 0.18 adults / 0.84 children.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Food control matters.

What are the study's limitations?

Model-based.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly supports residue concerns.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Low for EU.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

That milk itself is harmful.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Rahmani J et al.
Journal
Food Chem Toxicol
Year
2018
Identifier
PMID 29902498 DOI 10.1016/j.fct.2018.06.016
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Prevalence/concentration of AFM1 in Middle-East cow milk and carcinogenic risk.

3. Study design and population

Study design
Risk assessment – Systematic review, meta-analysis and probabilistic risk assessment (Monte Carlo) of aflatoxin M1 in milk.
Population

Milk samples from Middle-East countries

Country

Middle East incl. Egypt

Period

1995-Dec 2017

Sample size

49 articles; 7,484 data

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies on AFM1 in cow milk.

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

AFM1 in raw, pasteurised, UHT milk

Comparator

EC limit 50 ng/kg

Endpoints

Concentration, prevalence, hazard index.

Statistical methods

Meta-analysis; Monte Carlo simulation.

5. Actual results

Results

Pooled AFM1: UHT 82.57 ng/kg > raw 60.37 > pasteurised 45.81; raw and UHT above EC limit. Raw milk prevalence: Egypt 38%. Hazard index raw milk adults: Egypt 0.18; children: Egypt 0.84; children in several countries HI >1.

Absolute risks

not reported (hazard index)

Authors' conclusion

Unlike adults, children in several Middle-East countries are at considerable cancer risk from AFM1 in milk.

6. Strengths

  • Regional synthesis including Egypt

7. Weaknesses

  • Heterogeneous sampling
  • Hazard-index approach for a genotoxic carcinogen is debatable
  • Cheese not assessed

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBIS
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Abstract-level judgement.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Estimates are exposure-model outputs, not observed disease.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Mixed for C-DRY-01: contamination is real but concerns feed control, not 'milk = blood'.

11. Independent contrary findings

n/a

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Low (EU limits enforced).

13. Overall methodological judgement

Real regional contamination issue.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Current Egyptian data; cheese and butter levels.

15. Linked fact checks