Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-EGG-05 in-depth review
Eggs and risk of death: 2.2 million people
Egg Consumption and Risk of All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.
Overview
Mousavi SM et al.. Adv Nutr 2022 · PMID 35396834 · DOI 10.1093/advances/nmac040
Egg intake was not linked to overall or heart deaths; a small link with cancer deaths was found.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Is egg consumption associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality?
- How was the study done?
Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 33 cohorts
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
2,216,720 participants; 232,408 deaths; General population
- What was actually found?
Highest vs lowest: all-cause RR 1.02 (0.94-1.11); CVD 1.04 (0.87-1.23); CHD 0.98; stroke 0.81 (0.64-1.02); cancer mortality 1.20 (1.04-1.39). Per egg/week: +2% all-cause, +4% cancer, -4% stroke mortality (linear). Certainty low to moderate.
- How large was the observed effect?
Random effects
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Up to one egg a day appears compatible with a healthy diet.
- What are the study's limitations?
Overlap with other meta-analyses; Heterogeneity
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Mostly contradicts; notes uncertainty.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
High.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Cannot prove causation of cancer deaths.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Mousavi SM et al.
- Journal
- Adv Nutr
- Year
- 2022
- Identifier
- PMID 35396834 DOI 10.1093/advances/nmac040
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
None stated
2. Research question
Is egg consumption associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Meta-analysis – Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 33 cohorts
- Population
General population
- Country
Multinational
- Period
Search to March 2021
- Sample size
2,216,720 participants; 232,408 deaths
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Prospective cohorts
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Egg intake
- Comparator
Lowest category; per 1 egg/week
- Endpoints
All-cause, CVD, CHD, stroke, respiratory, cancer mortality
- Statistical methods
Random effects
5. Actual results
- Results
Highest vs lowest: all-cause RR 1.02 (0.94-1.11); CVD 1.04 (0.87-1.23); CHD 0.98; stroke 0.81 (0.64-1.02); cancer mortality 1.20 (1.04-1.39). Per egg/week: +2% all-cause, +4% cancer, -4% stroke mortality (linear). Certainty low to moderate.
- Absolute risks
not reported
- Authors' conclusion
Eggs can be consumed in low to moderate amounts (<=1 egg/day) as part of a healthy diet.
6. Strengths
- Large
- GRADE
7. Weaknesses
- Overlap with other meta-analyses
- Heterogeneity
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- AMSTAR 2
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Simplified.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Linear +2% per egg/week vs null highest-lowest: inconsistent small signal.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
11. Independent contrary findings
Cancer mortality signal.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
High.
13. Overall methodological judgement
No mortality harm overall; cancer mortality signal uncertain.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | moderate |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | mixed |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Cancer mortality.
15. Linked fact checks
- All eggs (chicken, quail, pigeon, ostrich, etc.) are harmful because an egg is an embryo / contains the 'full components of a living organism'. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim
- Higher egg (and dietary cholesterol) intake increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality (each additional half egg per day: +6% CVD, +8% mortality). – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim
- Eggs should be completely avoided (all kinds, all cooking methods). – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim