Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-EGG-05 in-depth review

Eggs and risk of death: 2.2 million people

Egg Consumption and Risk of All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.

Overview

Mousavi SM et al.. Adv Nutr 2022 · PMID 35396834 · DOI 10.1093/advances/nmac040

Egg intake was not linked to overall or heart deaths; a small link with cancer deaths was found.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Is egg consumption associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality?

How was the study done?

Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 33 cohorts

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

2,216,720 participants; 232,408 deaths; General population

What was actually found?

Highest vs lowest: all-cause RR 1.02 (0.94-1.11); CVD 1.04 (0.87-1.23); CHD 0.98; stroke 0.81 (0.64-1.02); cancer mortality 1.20 (1.04-1.39). Per egg/week: +2% all-cause, +4% cancer, -4% stroke mortality (linear). Certainty low to moderate.

How large was the observed effect?

Random effects

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Up to one egg a day appears compatible with a healthy diet.

What are the study's limitations?

Overlap with other meta-analyses; Heterogeneity

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Mostly contradicts; notes uncertainty.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot prove causation of cancer deaths.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Mousavi SM et al.
Journal
Adv Nutr
Year
2022
Identifier
PMID 35396834 DOI 10.1093/advances/nmac040
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

None stated

2. Research question

Is egg consumption associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 33 cohorts
Population

General population

Country

Multinational

Period

Search to March 2021

Sample size

2,216,720 participants; 232,408 deaths

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Prospective cohorts

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Egg intake

Comparator

Lowest category; per 1 egg/week

Endpoints

All-cause, CVD, CHD, stroke, respiratory, cancer mortality

Statistical methods

Random effects

5. Actual results

Results

Highest vs lowest: all-cause RR 1.02 (0.94-1.11); CVD 1.04 (0.87-1.23); CHD 0.98; stroke 0.81 (0.64-1.02); cancer mortality 1.20 (1.04-1.39). Per egg/week: +2% all-cause, +4% cancer, -4% stroke mortality (linear). Certainty low to moderate.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Eggs can be consumed in low to moderate amounts (<=1 egg/day) as part of a healthy diet.

6. Strengths

  • Large
  • GRADE

7. Weaknesses

  • Overlap with other meta-analyses
  • Heterogeneity

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Simplified.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Linear +2% per egg/week vs null highest-lowest: inconsistent small signal.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-EGG-04, C-EGG-02, C-EGG-11.

11. Independent contrary findings

Cancer mortality signal.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

No mortality harm overall; cancer mortality signal uncertain.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Cancer mortality.

15. Linked fact checks