Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-EGG-107 standard review
Cutting out 'intolerant' foods did not clearly prevent headaches
Randomised controlled trial of food elimination diet based on IgG antibodies for the prevention of migraine like headaches.
Overview
Mitchell N et al.. Nutr J 2011 · PMID 21835022 · DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-85
No significant difference at 12 weeks; small effect at 4 weeks.
Does the study support the specific claim? Unclear · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Test an elimination diet for headaches.
- How was the study done?
Randomized, sham-controlled trial.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
167 adults.
- What was actually found?
Primary outcome not improved.
- How large was the observed effect?
IRR 1.15 (0.94-1.41) at 12 weeks.
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Removing foods based on IgG tests is not proven to help headaches.
- What are the study's limitations?
Unvalidated test; eggs not separately reported.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Does not support that stopping eggs relieves headaches in general.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Applicable.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
It cannot rule out that some individuals react to eggs.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Mitchell N et al.
- Journal
- Nutr J
- Year
- 2011
- Identifier
- PMID 21835022 DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-85
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
not stated in abstract
2. Research question
Does removing foods identified by IgG testing reduce migraine-like headaches?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Randomised controlled trial – Randomized controlled trial, true vs sham elimination diet based on IgG (ELISA) food testing, 12 weeks
- Population
UK community volunteers with migraine-like headaches and at least one IgG-detected food 'intolerance'
- Country
United Kingdom
- Period
not stated in abstract
- Sample size
167 (84 true diet, 83 sham diet)
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
not detailed in abstract
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Elimination of individually IgG-positive foods
- Comparator
Sham elimination diet
- Endpoints
Headache days over 12 weeks (MIDAS item A); MIDAS total; HIT-6
- Statistical methods
Incidence rate ratios
5. Actual results
- Results
Primary outcome at 12 weeks: small, non-significant decrease in headache days (IRR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94-1.41, p = 0.18). At 4 weeks: significant reduction (IRR 1.23, 1.01-1.50, p = 0.04). Disability and impact scores did not differ between groups.
- Absolute risks
not reported
- Authors' conclusion
The IgG test with elimination advice did not reduce headache disability or headache days at 12 weeks, but reduced headache days at 4 weeks.
6. Strengths
- Sham-controlled randomized design
7. Weaknesses
- IgG food testing is not a validated diagnostic method for food allergy
- Individual foods eliminated varied; eggs not analysed separately
- Positive finding only at a secondary time point
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- RoB 2
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Primary endpoint null; secondary time point positive (multiplicity).
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Primary endpoint null; the 4-week result is a secondary time point and could be chance.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Tests the general idea that removing suspected foods prevents headaches: no effect on the primary outcome. Does not test eggs specifically.
11. Independent contrary findings
Short-term reduction at 4 weeks.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
UK trial.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Weak, indirect; does not support a general effect of food (including egg) elimination on headaches.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | low |
| Directness | very indirect |
| Reproducibility | unknown |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | unknown |
| Regional transferability | moderate |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Whether a subgroup with true food triggers benefits.
15. Linked fact checks
- Eating eggs causes snoring, sinusitis and nightmares in (practically) everyone who eats them, and stopping eggs and chicken relieves headaches. – Studies with mixed or unclear results