Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-FAST-118 standard review

Mindful eating and how much people eat

Effects of mindfulness and mindful eating on food intake and appetite: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overview

Ahmadyar K et al.. Clin Psychol Rev 2026 · PMID 42341365 · DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102780

Paying attention while eating slightly reduced how much people ate in experiments.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test mindful eating effects on intake.

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis of 41 articles.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Adults and children in experiments.

What was actually found?

Intake reduced; appetite ratings unchanged.

How large was the observed effect?

SMD -0.24 (-0.35 to -0.12).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Eating attentively may help avoid overeating.

What are the study's limitations?

Mainly lab studies.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly supports listening to hunger/fullness.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applies; same physiology.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Long-term weight or health outcomes.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Ahmadyar K et al.
Journal
Clin Psychol Rev
Year
2026
Identifier
PMID 42341365 DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102780
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref update-to/updated-by check
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

No conflicts declared.

2. Research question

Do mindfulness, mindful eating and intuitive eating interventions change food intake and appetite?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
Population

Adults and children

Country

International

Period

not stated in abstract

Sample size

41 articles (46 studies for intake)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Mindfulness / mindful eating (no eligible intuitive eating interventions found)

Comparator

Non-mindfulness control

Endpoints

Food intake; hunger and fullness ratings

Statistical methods

Random effects SMD

5. Actual results

Results

Mindfulness/mindful eating reduced food intake (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.12; 46 studies); no significant effect on appetite (11 studies); larger effects in laboratory studies.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Mindfulness and mindful eating reliably reduce food intake in controlled settings; no evidence they influence appetite.

6. Strengths

  • Large number of experiments

7. Weaknesses

  • Mostly short laboratory studies
  • No intuitive eating trials found

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Lab-based, short-term outcomes.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Small effect (SMD -0.24).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Attending to hunger and satiety signals (mindful eating) modestly reduces intake - partial support for 'eat when hungry, stop when full'.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Universal biology; applies in Europe and Egypt.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Modest indirect support for the healthy-adult part of the claim.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks