Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-FAST-118 standard review
Mindful eating and how much people eat
Effects of mindfulness and mindful eating on food intake and appetite: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Overview
Ahmadyar K et al.. Clin Psychol Rev 2026 · PMID 42341365 · DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102780
Paying attention while eating slightly reduced how much people ate in experiments.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Test mindful eating effects on intake.
- How was the study done?
Meta-analysis of 41 articles.
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
Adults and children in experiments.
- What was actually found?
Intake reduced; appetite ratings unchanged.
- How large was the observed effect?
SMD -0.24 (-0.35 to -0.12).
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Eating attentively may help avoid overeating.
- What are the study's limitations?
Mainly lab studies.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Partly supports listening to hunger/fullness.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Applies; same physiology.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Long-term weight or health outcomes.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Ahmadyar K et al.
- Journal
- Clin Psychol Rev
- Year
- 2026
- Identifier
- PMID 42341365 DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102780
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref update-to/updated-by check
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
No conflicts declared.
2. Research question
Do mindfulness, mindful eating and intuitive eating interventions change food intake and appetite?
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
- Population
Adults and children
- Country
International
- Period
not stated in abstract
- Sample size
41 articles (46 studies for intake)
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
not stated in abstract
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Mindfulness / mindful eating (no eligible intuitive eating interventions found)
- Comparator
Non-mindfulness control
- Endpoints
Food intake; hunger and fullness ratings
- Statistical methods
Random effects SMD
5. Actual results
- Results
Mindfulness/mindful eating reduced food intake (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.12; 46 studies); no significant effect on appetite (11 studies); larger effects in laboratory studies.
- Absolute risks
not reported
- Authors' conclusion
Mindfulness and mindful eating reliably reduce food intake in controlled settings; no evidence they influence appetite.
6. Strengths
- Large number of experiments
7. Weaknesses
- Mostly short laboratory studies
- No intuitive eating trials found
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- AMSTAR 2
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
- Rationale
Lab-based, short-term outcomes.
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Small effect (SMD -0.24).
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Attending to hunger and satiety signals (mindful eating) modestly reduces intake - partial support for 'eat when hungry, stop when full'.
11. Independent contrary findings
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Universal biology; applies in Europe and Egypt.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Modest indirect support for the healthy-adult part of the claim.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | moderate |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | moderate |
| Directness | indirect |
| Reproducibility | replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
15. Linked fact checks
- Eat only when you are hungry and stop when full; no fixed meal times or quantities. – Studies supporting the claim