Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-FAST-12 in-depth review

DiRECT: weight loss to put type 2 diabetes into remission

Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial.

Overview

Lean ME et al.. Lancet 2018 · PMID 29221645 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33102-1

46% of people in the programme were free of diabetes and medication after one year.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Can intensive weight management in primary care achieve T2D remission?

How was the study done?

Open-label cluster-randomised trial (DiRECT)

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

306 (149 per group ITT); 49 practices; Age 20-65, T2D <6 years, BMI 27-45, not on insulin

What was actually found?

Remission 46% vs 4%.

How large was the observed effect?

OR 19.7

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Losing 10-15 kg can reverse early type 2 diabetes.

What are the study's limitations?

Open-label; Selected population; Formula diet

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports C-DIAB-03 (with conditions); limited relevance to C-INS-10 (insulin users excluded).

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

UK; directly relevant.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Effect of the Tayebat diet; effect in type 1 or insulin-treated diabetes.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Lean ME et al.
Journal
Lancet
Year
2018
Identifier
PMID 29221645 DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33102-1
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25 (this agent)
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Funded by Diabetes UK.

2. Research question

Can intensive weight management in primary care achieve T2D remission?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Open-label cluster-randomised trial (DiRECT)
Population

Age 20-65, T2D <6 years, BMI 27-45, not on insulin

Country

UK (Scotland, Tyneside)

Period

2014-2017; 12 months

Sample size

306 (149 per group ITT); 49 practices

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

As described in the abstract; details not available in abstract.

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Drug withdrawal, total diet replacement 825-853 kcal/day 3-5 months, food reintroduction, maintenance support

Comparator

Best-practice guideline care

Endpoints

Weight loss >=15 kg; remission (HbA1c <6.5% off drugs >=2 months)

Statistical methods

Hierarchical ITT

5. Actual results

Results

Weight loss >=15 kg 24% vs 0%; remission 46% vs 4% (OR 19.7, 7.8-49.8). Remission by weight loss: 0% (gain), 7% (0-5 kg), 34% (5-10), 57% (10-15), 86% (>=15). Mean weight -10.0 vs -1.0 kg. 9 vs 2 SAEs.

Absolute risks

Remission 46% vs 4%.

Authors' conclusion

Almost half achieved remission off antidiabetic drugs at 12 months.

6. Strengths

  • Randomised
  • Primary care setting
  • Clear definition

7. Weaknesses

  • Open-label
  • Selected population
  • Formula diet

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Open-label, objective HbA1c outcome.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Large effect, dose-response with weight loss.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports C-DIAB-03 (with conditions); limited relevance to C-INS-10 (insulin users excluded).

11. Independent contrary findings

I-FAST-14 (durability).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

UK; directly relevant.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Strong evidence that substantial weight loss can induce remission of early T2D.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

None beyond those stated.

15. Linked fact checks