People with diabetes can stop insulin and diabetes medication by following the Tayebat system ('zero medicine'), as shown by followers who stopped insulin and are 'perfectly fine'.
Original statement
ساره السيد بيقوللك بطل الانسولين الحمد لله زي الفل
verbatim according to source. Translation by the project; the Arabic wording is authoritative.
Translation
People with diabetes can stop insulin and diabetes medication by following the Tayebat system ('zero medicine'), as shown by followers who stopped insulin and are 'perfectly fine'.
Origin
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! الكورتيزون حياتك (Open source)
- Published
- 17 October 2025
- Timestamp
- 1:58:13 (location in the original video’s automatic YouTube caption track; confirms where the words occur, not who speaks)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); no timestamps; 'published' is the date listed by the archive and may be the upload date. The primary quote is a viewer's message ('Sarah El-Sayed tells you ...') that Elawady reads aloud and comments on approvingly during a live stream; it is not his own statement. His own statements are in the alternative sources, e.g. PBygUgVhUM8 ('I am the one who stopped it for him') and aEbRfVSJIOw ('zero medicine').
- Claimed mechanism
Removing harmful food inputs restores the body, making insulin unnecessary.
- Claimed health effect
Stopping insulin is safe/curative
- Population concerned
People with type 1 and type 2 diabetes
- Geographic restriction by Elawady
none found
Diverging source versions
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! ٢ (Open source)
- Published
- 20 August 2025
- Timestamp
- not available (transcript has no timings)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); no timestamps; 'published' is the date listed by the archive and may be the upload date. Live-stream transcripts can contain viewer comments read aloud; the quoted passage was checked in context to be spoken by Elawady.
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! مفيش حاجه سعرات مفيش حاجه اسمها نشويات (Open source)
- Published
- 7 August 2025
- Timestamp
- not available (transcript has no timings)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); no timestamps; 'published' is the date listed by the archive and may be the upload date. Live-stream transcripts can contain viewer comments read aloud; the quoted passage was checked in context to be spoken by Elawady.
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- Dr Diaa Al Awady د ضياء العوضي is live! السيليوليت (Open source)
- Published
- 11 October 2025
- Timestamp
- not available (transcript has no timings)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); no timestamps; 'published' is the date listed by the archive and may be the upload date. Live-stream transcripts can contain viewer comments read aloud; the quoted passage was checked in context to be spoken by Elawady.
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- بيان فلسفه النظريه (Open source)
- Published
- 14 February 2026
- Timestamp
- not available (transcript has no timings)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); no timestamps; 'published' is the date listed by the archive and may be the upload date. Live-stream transcripts can contain viewer comments read aloud; the quoted passage was checked in context to be spoken by Elawady.
- Source status
- Video transcript (own words)
- Attribution
- Elawady (machine transcript)
- Video
- ارتفاع السكر والأسيتون ؟خطر والا ده الطبيعي ؟#ضياء_العوضي (Open source)
- Published
- 23 December 2025
- Timestamp
- not available (transcript has no timings)
- Attribution uncertainty
- Archive transcript (YouTube CC or AI-generated); no timestamps; 'published' is the date listed by the archive and may be the upload date. Live-stream transcripts can contain viewer comments read aloud; the quoted passage was checked in context to be spoken by Elawady.
Scientific assessment
False – The statement contradicts the robust evidence.
Certainty of evidence: high – Further research is very unlikely to change the assessment.
1. What was claimed?
Following the system allows people to stop insulin; testimonies show success; the method is 'zero medicine'.
2. What is demonstrably correct?
In type 2 diabetes of short duration, intensive weight loss can lead to remission off all glucose-lowering drugs in a substantial minority (46% at 1 year in DiRECT; participants on insulin were excluded) (I-FAST-12). Insulin doses in type 2 diabetes can often be reduced when weight falls or when metformin is added (A-INS-19). Elawady also says that people who stop insulin are responsible for themselves, which is a disclaimer, not a safety instruction.
3. What is wrong or exaggerated?
Individual success stories told during live streams cannot show safety or efficacy; people who were harmed are not presented. People with type 1 diabetes or advanced insulin-deficient type 2 diabetes cannot stop insulin (I-ODD-16, I-INS-07). A 'zero medicine' rule contradicts the evidence that metformin, SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce death and organ damage in defined groups (I-ODD-01 to I-ODD-07).
4. What remains unclear?
How many followers stopped insulin and what happened to them is unknown; no registry or study exists.
5. Which studies support it?
I-FAST-12 (diet-induced remission in early, non-insulin type 2 diabetes; limited relevance).
6. Which studies contradict it?
I-INS-07, I-INS-08, I-ODD-16, I-INS-03.
7. What applies to Germany and Europe?
European (EASD) and German (DDG) guidance follow the same evidence base as the ADA/EASD consensus: individualised HbA1c targets, insulin as mandatory therapy in type 1 diabetes, and SGLT2 inhibitors/GLP-1 receptor agonists for people with cardiovascular or kidney disease. No country-specific difference changes the assessment.
8. What is known about Egypt?
Egypt has one of the highest diabetes prevalences in the region; the same drug classes and insulins are used. Access barriers and cost may make advice to stop medication attractive, which increases the practical risk of this claim. No Egypt-specific evidence changes the assessment.
9. What practical conclusion is appropriate?
Reducing diabetes medication is possible for some people with type 2 diabetes, but only step by step with glucose monitoring and medical supervision. Insulin must never be stopped by people with type 1 diabetes.
Assessment details
- Rationale for certainty of evidence
Anecdotes read out in live streams are not evidence; no outcome data on the system exist. In type 1 diabetes stopping insulin is reliably fatal without treatment. In type 2 diabetes, some people can reduce or stop medication after substantial weight loss under supervision (DiRECT, which excluded insulin users), so the claim is false as a general statement and dangerous for insulin-deficient people.
- Source quality
Own words; testimonies are second-hand and unverifiable. Elawady also states that whoever stops insulin is responsible for himself.
- Regional transferability
Universal.
- Individual exceptions
Some people with early type 2 diabetes and weight loss can come off medication under medical supervision (see C-DIAB-03).
- Regional scope of the claim
- general (biological/medical)
- Last reviewed
- 25 October 2026 provisional
In plain language
The videos present people who say they stopped insulin and feel well. Such stories cannot tell us how many others became ill. People with type 1 diabetes die without insulin. Some people with type 2 diabetes can reduce or stop medicines after losing a lot of weight, but this must be done with a doctor and regular blood sugar checks.
Studies on this claim
Studies supporting the claim (1)
-
DiRECT: weight loss to put type 2 diabetes into remission
Lean ME et al.. Lancet 2018 · PMID 29221645 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33102-1Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study46% of people in the programme were free of diabetes and medication after one year.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Can intensive weight management in primary care achieve T2D remission?
- How was the study done?
Open-label cluster-randomised trial (DiRECT)
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
306 (149 per group ITT); 49 practices; Age 20-65, T2D <6 years, BMI 27-45, not on insulin
- What was actually found?
Remission 46% vs 4%.
- How large was the observed effect?
OR 19.7
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Losing 10-15 kg can reverse early type 2 diabetes.
- What are the study's limitations?
Open-label; Selected population; Formula diet
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Supports C-DIAB-03 (with conditions); limited relevance to C-INS-10 (insulin users excluded).
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
UK; directly relevant.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Effect of the Tayebat diet; effect in type 1 or insulin-treated diabetes.
No study in this group is marked as key.
Studies contradicting or limiting the claim (4)
-
International guideline on diabetic ketoacidosis
Umpierrez GE et al.. Diabetes Care 2024 · PMID 39052901 · DOI 10.2337/dci24-0032Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key studyInsulin, fluids and potassium are the core treatment; with this, fewer than 1% of adults die.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Diagnosis and management of DKA and HHS in adults
- How was the study done?
International consensus report based on systematic examination of literature since 2009 (ADA, EASD, JBDS, AACE, DTS)
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
not applicable; Adults with diabetes
- What was actually found?
Insulin is the cornerstone; glucocorticoids worsen hyperglycaemia.
- How large was the observed effect?
Mortality <1% with treatment
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Ketoacidosis needs hospital treatment with insulin.
- What are the study's limitations?
Consensus, not trial
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Directly contradicts C-INS-08; supports danger in C-FAST-03; contradicts C-INS-07, C-INS-10.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
EASD and JBDS (UK) co-authored; directly applicable.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Outcomes of untreated DKA quantitatively.
-
Review on diabetic ketoacidosis
Dhatariya KK et al.. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020 · PMID 32409703 · DOI 10.1038/s41572-020-0165-1Narrative reviewindependent cross-checkfull text checkedDKA is an emergency that can kill; it is treated with fluids, insulin and salts, and insulin must not be stopped in type 1 diabetes even when not eating.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of DKA
- How was the study done?
Narrative expert review (Nature Reviews Disease Primers)
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
not applicable; Adults and children with diabetes
- What was actually found?
DKA is diagnosed by high glucose, ketones and acid; it kills <1% when treated in rich countries but up to 26-41% where treatment is lacking; treatment is fluids, insulin and potassium, and insulin must never be stopped in type 1 diabetes even when not eating.
- How large was the observed effect?
not applicable
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
DKA is an emergency.
- What are the study's limitations?
Narrative expert review without systematic methods; one author has research support from insulin makers.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
International.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Quantitative estimates.
-
ADA guideline 2026: diabetes medicines
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*. Diabetes Care 2026 · PMID 41358900 · DOI 10.2337/dc26-S009Guideline / position statementindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key studyInsulin is essential in type 1 diabetes; SGLT2/GLP-1 drugs are recommended for heart and kidney protection; side effects listed.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Pharmacologic glycaemic treatment
- How was the study done?
Clinical practice guideline (ADA Standards of Care 2026, Section 9)
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
not applicable; People with type 1 and type 2 diabetes
- What was actually found?
See results.
- How large was the observed effect?
not applicable
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Medicines chosen by benefit-risk.
- What are the study's limitations?
Partially read
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Contradicts C-INS-07, C-INS-10, C-ODD-06; supports C-ODD-07, C-INS-11.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Consistent with ADA/EASD consensus.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Not applicable.
-
DCCT: better insulin treatment in type 1 diabetes
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group; Nathan DM et al.. N Engl J Med 1993 · PMID 8366922 · DOI 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key studyIntensive insulin cut the risk of eye damage by three-quarters and nerve damage by 60%, with more low-sugar episodes.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Does intensive insulin therapy reduce long-term complications in type 1 diabetes?
- How was the study done?
Multicentre RCT (DCCT)
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
1,441; Insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes
- What was actually found?
Large reductions in all microvascular complications.
- How large was the observed effect?
Retinopathy -76%
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Insulin protects eyes, kidneys and nerves in type 1 diabetes.
- What are the study's limitations?
Open-label; Selected young population
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Contradicts C-INS-07, C-INS-09, C-DIAB-01; shows insulin efficacy and hypoglycaemia cost (C-INS-02 kernel).
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
North American; universally accepted.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Effects in type 2 diabetes directly.
No study in this group is marked as key.
Studies with mixed or unclear results (1)
-
Adding metformin to insulin
Wulffelé MG et al.. Diabetes Care 2002 · PMID 12453950 · DOI 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2133Randomised controlled trialcited by the Tayebat archiveabstract only checkedMetformin improved sugar control and reduced insulin need and weight gain.
Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate · Certainty of evidence: see overall assessment of the claim
Original publication · Scientific details
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Metformin added to intensive insulin in type 2 diabetes
- How was the study done?
Double-blind placebo-controlled RCT
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
390; Insulin-treated type 2 diabetes
- What was actually found?
Better control, less insulin, less weight gain.
- How large was the observed effect?
GHb -0.7%
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Combination lowers insulin needs.
- What are the study's limitations?
Short duration; Dropouts higher with metformin
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Dutch data.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
That insulin can be stopped.
No study in this group is marked as key.
Regional context
Germany / EU
European (EASD) and German (DDG) guidance follow the same evidence base as the ADA/EASD consensus: individualised HbA1c targets, insulin as mandatory therapy in type 1 diabetes, and SGLT2 inhibitors/GLP-1 receptor agonists for people with cardiovascular or kidney disease. No country-specific difference changes the assessment.
Egypt
Egypt has one of the highest diabetes prevalences in the region; the same drug classes and insulins are used. Access barriers and cost may make advice to stop medication attractive, which increases the practical risk of this claim. No Egypt-specific evidence changes the assessment.
What applies in my country?
General scientific assessment
False Stopping insulin on one's own is dangerous; any reduction belongs under medical supervision.
This statement concerns biological or medical relationships. The scientific assessment above applies regardless of the country; country-specific food data do not change it.
References
- Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial.. Lean ME et al.. Lancet 2018 · PMID 29221645 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33102-1
- Hyperglycemic Crises in Adults With Diabetes: A Consensus Report.. Umpierrez GE et al.. Diabetes Care 2024 · PMID 39052901 · DOI 10.2337/dci24-0032
- Diabetic ketoacidosis.. Dhatariya KK et al.. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020 · PMID 32409703 · DOI 10.1038/s41572-020-0165-1
- 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*. Diabetes Care 2026 · PMID 41358900 · DOI 10.2337/dc26-S009
- The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group; Nathan DM et al.. N Engl J Med 1993 · PMID 8366922 · DOI 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401
- Combination of insulin and metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.. Wulffelé MG et al.. Diabetes Care 2002 · PMID 12453950 · DOI 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2133