Systematic reviewindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-FAST-122 in-depth review

Drinking more water to prevent kidney stones

Water for preventing urinary stones.

Overview

Bao Y et al.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020 · PMID 32045491 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD004292.pub4

People who had kidney stones and drank enough to pass 2 litres of urine a day had fewer new stones.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Assess water for stone prevention.

How was the study done?

Cochrane review.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

1 RCT, 220 people.

What was actually found?

RR 0.45 for recurrence.

How large was the observed effect?

149 fewer recurrences per 1000.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Stone formers should drink more than thirst alone suggests.

What are the study's limitations?

Only one trial.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Limits the thirst-only rule; contradicts water restriction.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable; stone disease common in Egypt's hot climate.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Primary prevention.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Bao Y et al.
Journal
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Year
2020
Identifier
PMID 32045491 DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD004292.pub4
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref update-to/updated-by check
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

None known.

2. Research question

Does increased water intake prevent urinary stones?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Systematic review – Cochrane systematic review of RCTs
Population

People with or without history of stones

Country

Italy (the single included RCT)

Period

Search to 15 Oct 2019

Sample size

1 RCT, 220 randomised (199 analysed)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

not stated in abstract

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Increased water intake to urine volume >=2.0 L/day

Comparator

Standard water intake

Endpoints

Stone recurrence, time to recurrence, adverse events

Statistical methods

RR, HR; GRADE

5. Actual results

Results

No RCT for primary prevention. Secondary prevention: recurrence RR 0.45 (95% CI 0.24-0.84; low certainty), 149 fewer per 1000 over 5 years (control 270/1000); time to recurrence HR 0.40 (0.20-0.79). No evidence on adverse events.

Absolute risks

270 vs about 122 recurrences per 1000 over 5 years (ARR about 15%, NNT about 7; stats/I-FAST-122_water_stones.py).

Authors' conclusion

Increased water intake achieving >=2.0 L urine/day may reduce stone recurrence; confidence limited; no RCT evidence for primary prevention.

6. Strengths

  • Cochrane methods
  • Absolute effects reported

7. Weaknesses

  • Single trial (same as I-FAST-09)
  • Low certainty

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
low
Rationale

Review well conducted; evidence base is one trial.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Same data as Borghi 1996; not an independent confirmation.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Shows that for stone formers, drinking deliberately more than thirst dictates helps; limits 'drink only when thirsty' and contradicts 'do not drink much water'.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Universal biology; applies in Europe and Egypt.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Low-certainty but relevant evidence for a common condition in hot climates.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biaslow
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitynot replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceunknown
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks