Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-GUT-02 in-depth review

Treating H. pylori prevents ulcers returning (Cochrane)

Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori-positive people.

Overview

Ford AC et al.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016 · PMID 27092708 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003840.pub5

Duodenal ulcer recurrence fell from 64% without treatment to 13% with eradication.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Ulcer treatment.

How was the study done?

Cochrane review.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

Thousands.

What was actually found?

Fewer recurrences.

How large was the observed effect?

RR 0.20.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Eradication works.

What are the study's limitations?

Older trials.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts C-GUT-06.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Ford AC et al.
Journal
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Year
2016
Identifier
PMID 27092708 DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003840.pub5
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Kurinchi Gurusamy: receives funding from the National Institute for Health Research to perform systematic reviews (Sources of support) and from Wellcome Trust UK and Cancer Research UK for unrelated projects. Alex Ford: none. Brendan Delaney: has received speaker's fees from Astra Zeneca and AxCan Pharma, holds grants from the MRC and NHS R&D programme and is supported by an NHS R&D Primary Care Career Scientist Award (No. CSA99/008). David Forman: has received speakers/consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Wyeth, and Takeda. Paul Moayyedi: chair at McMaster University partly funded by an unrestricted donation by AstraZeneca, and has received consultant's and speaker's bureau fees from AstraZeneca, AxCan Pharma, Nycomed, and Johnson & Johnson.

2. Research question

Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer in H. pylori-positive people

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs
Population

H. pylori-positive ulcer patients

Country

Multinational

Sample size

Many RCTs (e.g. 27 trials, 2,509 for duodenal recurrence)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

RCTs

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Eradication therapy

Comparator

Ulcer healing drugs; no treatment

Endpoints

Healing, recurrence

Statistical methods

Pooled RR; GRADE

5. Actual results

Results

Preventing duodenal ulcer recurrence vs no treatment: RR 0.20 (0.15–0.26), 12.9% vs 64.4% (very low quality); gastric ulcer recurrence RR 0.31 (0.22–0.45), 16.3% vs 52.4%; effective for duodenal ulcer healing vs ulcer-healing drugs alone.

Absolute risks

Recurrence 12.9% vs 64.4% (duodenal)

Authors' conclusion

Eradication is effective for H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer and prevents recurrence of duodenal and gastric ulcers vs no treatment.

6. Strengths

  • Cochrane
  • Many RCTs

7. Weaknesses

  • Low/very low GRADE for some outcomes (older trials)

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
low
Rationale

High-quality review; primary trial quality limited.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Large, consistent effects.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-GUT-06.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Strong evidence that H. pylori causes ulcer recurrence.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biaslow
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks