Otherindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-INS-112 in-depth review

Fasting, lack of water and ketoacidosis in type 1 diabetes

Differential effects of fasting and dehydration in the pathogenesis of diabetic ketoacidosis.

Overview

Burge MR et al.. Metabolism 2001 · PMID 11229425 · DOI 10.1053/meta.2001.20194

When insulin was stopped, prior fasting lowered blood sugar but made ketones and acid build up faster; lack of water raised both sugar and ketones.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Study how fasting and dehydration influence DKA development.

How was the study done?

Short insulin withdrawal experiments.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

25 adults with T1D.

What was actually found?

Fasting: lower glucose but faster ketosis; dehydration: higher glucose and faster ketosis.

How large was the observed effect?

Not given in abstract.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Fasting can hide danger: sugar falls while acid rises.

What are the study's limitations?

Small study.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts dry fasting as DKA treatment.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Universal physiology.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot give clinical outcome rates.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Burge MR et al.
Journal
Metabolism
Year
2001
Identifier
PMID 11229425 DOI 10.1053/meta.2001.20194
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

NIH grants (record).

2. Research question

How do fasting and dehydration affect glucose and ketosis during insulin withdrawal in T1D?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Other – Experimental physiology study: 5-hour insulin withdrawal before (control) and after 32-h fasting or dehydration
Population

Adults with T1D

Country

USA

Period

Not stated in abstract

Sample size

25 (fasting n=10; dehydration n=15)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Type 1 diabetes

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

32 h fasting or dehydration (4.1% body weight) before insulin withdrawal

Comparator

Insulin withdrawal without prior fasting/dehydration

Endpoints

Glucose, glucose production/disposal, glucagon, ketosis, acidosis

Statistical methods

Within-subject comparison

5. Actual results

Results

Fasting lowered plasma glucose but dehydration raised it (P<.001). Glucagon and the rate of development of ketosis and metabolic acidosis were increased during both fasting and dehydration compared with control.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Fasting and dehydration have differential effects on glycaemia during insulin deficiency; both accelerate ketosis and acidosis.

6. Strengths

  • Controlled physiological experiment in T1D

7. Weaknesses

  • Small
  • Short experimental exposure
  • Old

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Small physiological study.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Mechanistic; direction of effects clear, magnitudes not given in abstract.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Fasting may lower glucose (a correct observation), but fasting and dehydration both speed up ketoacidosis when insulin is lacking; a dry fast without insulin therefore worsens DKA.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Directly applicable; same biology and clinical standards in Europe.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Mechanistic evidence against 'complete fasting from food and drink' as DKA treatment.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks