Systematic reviewindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-INTA-10 in-depth review

Does intermittent fasting help during chemotherapy?

Impact of intermittent fasting on patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy and/or targeted therapies: a systematic review of the literature.

Overview

Maes J et al.. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 2025 · PMID 40970988 · DOI 10.1007/s00520-025-09907-7

Nine small studies found fasting feasible and safe under supervision but showed no proven effect on treatment results or side effects.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Intermittent fasting during cancer therapy

How was the study done?

Systematic review

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

9 studies, 354 patients

What was actually found?

Safe and feasible; no demonstrated effect on outcomes

How large was the observed effect?

Not pooled

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Fasting is not a proven cancer treatment

What are the study's limitations?

Few small studies

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts 'treating cancer with fasting'

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Effects of fasting without standard treatment (not studied)

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Maes J et al.
Journal
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
Year
2025
Identifier
PMID 40970988 DOI 10.1007/s00520-025-09907-7
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Safety, feasibility, tolerability and metabolic effects of intermittent fasting in patients receiving chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy

3. Study design and population

Study design
Systematic review – Systematic review
Population

Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or targeted therapy (mostly breast cancer)

Country

Multinational

Period

1990 to March 2025

Sample size

9 studies, 354 patients (258 with breast cancer)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies of intermittent fasting during chemotherapy/targeted therapy

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Intermittent fasting

Comparator

Usual diet (varies)

Endpoints

Treatment efficacy, toxicity, quality of life, fasting tolerance, metabolic markers

Statistical methods

Narrative synthesis; risk-of-bias assessment

5. Actual results

Results

Safety and feasibility confirmed, but no impact on treatment outcomes or chemotherapy-related toxicities demonstrated. Consistent trend of lower insulin and IGF-1 and higher erythrocyte levels with fasting. Three studies reported no difference in body weight/BMI. Risk of bias low to moderate.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Intermittent fasting appears safe and feasible, but evidence is insufficient to conclude on treatment effectiveness or side effects; larger RCTs needed.

6. Strengths

  • Recent systematic search
  • Risk-of-bias assessment

7. Weaknesses

  • Few, small studies
  • Mostly breast cancer
  • Short-term fasting regimens, not alternate-day fasting as sole therapy

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Simplified; small evidence base.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Absence of demonstrated benefit with low power; not proof of no effect.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Summarises all clinical data on intermittent fasting during cancer therapy.

11. Independent contrary findings

DIRECT trial (I-INTA-08) signal on response.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Fasting during cancer therapy is a research question, not an established treatment.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Large RCTs with survival endpoints.

15. Linked fact checks