Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-LEG-125 standard review

Do beans really cause much gas?

Perceptions of flatulence from bean consumption among adults in 3 feeding studies.

Overview

Winham DM, Hutchins AM. Nutr J 2011 · PMID 22104320 · DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-128

Fewer than half of adults noticed more gas when they started eating beans daily, and it eased over time.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Assess flatulence from beans.

How was the study done?

Feeding trials.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

126 adults.

What was actually found?

<50% more flatulence at first.

How large was the observed effect?

19% with black-eyed peas.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Bean gas is usually mild.

What are the study's limitations?

Self-report.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts dramatic gas claims.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

It does not address dizziness or anaemia.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Winham DM, Hutchins AM
Journal
Nutr J
Year
2011
Identifier
PMID 22104320 DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-128 · PMC3228670
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref works API
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Not stated in abstract.

2. Research question

How often do adults perceive increased flatulence and GI discomfort when eating 1/2 cup of beans daily?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – Secondary analysis of three randomised feeding trials (two crossover, one parallel)
Population

Adults in three bean feeding studies

Country

USA (inferred from reference to US Dietary Guidelines; not explicit)

Period

8-12 week phases

Sample size

17 + 29 + 80 participants

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Trial participants.

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

1/2 cup pinto beans, black-eyed peas or baked beans daily

Comparator

Canned carrots or control soup

Endpoints

Perceived flatulence, stool changes, bloating

Statistical methods

Chi-square

5. Actual results

Results

Less than 50% reported increased flatulence with pinto or baked beans in the first week; 19% with black-eyed peas; 3-11% reported increased flatulence on control diets.

Absolute risks

Not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Concerns about excessive flatulence from beans may be exaggerated; individual variation exists.

6. Strengths

  • Randomised controlled feeding context

7. Weaknesses

  • Self-reported symptoms
  • Small; secondary analysis
  • Abstract only

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Unblinded symptom reporting.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Symptoms common at start, decreased over time (per full study design).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Shows that bean-related gas is common but usually mild and transient (C-LEG-09); relevant to legume intolerance outside IBS (C-LEG-12).

11. Independent contrary findings

None.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Applicable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Gas from beans is real but overestimated; no link to other diseases.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

None.

15. Linked fact checks