Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-MEAT-06 in-depth review

Too much vitamin A in early pregnancy linked to birth defects

Teratogenicity of high vitamin A intake.

Overview

Rothman KJ et al.. N Engl J Med 1995 · PMID 7477116 · DOI 10.1056/NEJM199511233332101

Above 15,000 IU/day: 3.5-fold more defects of head/face structures.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Vitamin A and birth defects.

How was the study done?

Prospective study.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

22,748 pregnant women.

What was actually found?

High vitamin A teratogenic.

How large was the observed effect?

PR 3.5 (1.7-7.3).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Pregnant women should avoid very high vitamin A sources such as liver.

What are the study's limitations?

Self-reported diet.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts free liver intake in pregnancy.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Exact safe liver portion.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Rothman KJ et al.
Journal
N Engl J Med
Year
1995
Identifier
PMID 7477116 DOI 10.1056/NEJM199511233332101
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Grants listed in PubMed: NINDS NIH HHS

2. Research question

Is high vitamin A intake teratogenic?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Prospective study of pregnant women with dietary interviews (first trimester).
Population

Pregnant women undergoing AFP screening or amniocentesis

Country

USA

Period

Oct 1984 - June 1987

Sample size

22,748 women; 339 babies with defects (121 cranial-neural-crest)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Not detailed in abstract.

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Preformed vitamin A from food and supplements

Comparator

<=5,000 IU/day

Endpoints

Birth defects (cranial-neural-crest).

Statistical methods

Prevalence ratios; smoothed regression.

5. Actual results

Results

>15,000 IU/day food+supplements vs <=5,000: prevalence ratio 3.5 (1.7-7.3); supplements >10,000 IU/day vs <=5,000: 4.8 (2.2-10.5); apparent threshold near 10,000 IU/day supplemental; risk concentrated before week 7.

Absolute risks

Estimated 1 in 57 infants of women taking >10,000 IU/day supplements had a malformation attributable to the supplement.

Authors' conclusion

High dietary intake of preformed vitamin A appears teratogenic.

6. Strengths

  • Large prospective dataset
  • Biological plausibility (retinoids)

7. Weaknesses

  • Dietary vitamin A self-reported
  • Few exposed cases

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Exposure misclassification possible.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Strong relative effects; wide CIs.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Contradicts unrestricted liver allowance (C-MEAT-03) for pregnancy.

11. Independent contrary findings

n/a

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Basis for pregnancy advice on preformed vitamin A.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessindirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Liver-specific dose.

15. Linked fact checks