Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study I-ODD-03 in-depth review
Dapagliflozin (Forxiga) in kidney disease
Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.
Overview
Heerspink HJL et al.. N Engl J Med 2020 · PMID 32970396 · DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa2024816
Forxiga reduced kidney failure and deaths; the trial was stopped early because the benefit was clear.
Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: high
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Dapagliflozin in CKD with/without diabetes
- How was the study done?
Double-blind placebo-controlled RCT (DAPA-CKD)
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
4,304; CKD (eGFR 25-75, albuminuria)
- What was actually found?
Kidney failure, kidney decline or kidney/heart death: 9.2% with dapagliflozin vs 14.5% with placebo; deaths 4.7% vs 6.8%. Amputations 1.6% vs 1.8%; no ketoacidosis cases with dapagliflozin (2 with placebo).
- How large was the observed effect?
HR 0.61; death HR 0.69
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
This drug class protects heart and/or kidneys in the studied patients.
- What are the study's limitations?
Industry funded; stopped early for benefit (can overstate effect); selected high-risk CKD population; type 1 diabetes excluded; median 2.4 years follow-up.
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Contradicts C-ODD-06 (Forxiga 'kills'); context for C-ODD-02.
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
Multinational trial including European sites or directly applicable to EU practice.
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Benefit in low-risk people; absence of side effects.
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Heerspink HJL et al.
- Journal
- N Engl J Med
- Year
- 2020
- Identifier
- PMID 32970396 DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa2024816
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25 (this agent)
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
- none
- Extent checked
- full text
- Conflicts of interest and funding
Sponsored and funded by AstraZeneca (manufacturer); 4 of 14 authors AstraZeneca employees; executive committee of 9 academics plus 2 non-voting sponsor employees; sponsor analyses independently replicated at UMC Groningen; editorial assistance funded by AstraZeneca.
2. Research question
Dapagliflozin in CKD with/without diabetes
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Randomised controlled trial – Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre event-driven RCT (DAPA-CKD, NCT03036150), stopped early for efficacy on recommendation of the independent data monitoring committee
- Population
Adults with CKD (eGFR 25-75 ml/min/1.73 m2, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio 200-5000 mg/g) on stable ACE inhibitor/ARB unless intolerant; 67.5% with type 2 diabetes; mean age 61.8 years; 33.1% female; mean eGFR 43.1; median UACR 949
- Country
386 sites in 21 countries (including European sites, China, Latin America, North America)
- Period
February 2017 to June 2020 (efficacy cut-off 3 April 2020); median follow-up 2.4 years (IQR 2.0-2.7)
- Sample size
4,304 randomised (2,152 per group); 7,517 screened
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Included: eGFR 25-75, UACR 200-5000, stable ACEi/ARB >=4 weeks (unless documented intolerance), with or without T2DM. Excluded: type 1 diabetes, polycystic kidney disease, lupus nephritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, immunotherapy for kidney disease within 6 months. Stage 2 CKD capped at 10%.
4. Methods and endpoints
- Exposure / intervention
Dapagliflozin 10 mg
- Comparator
Placebo on top of standard care
- Endpoints
eGFR decline >=50%, ESKD, renal/CV death
- Statistical methods
ITT; Cox model stratified by T2DM and UACR, adjusted for baseline eGFR; closed hierarchical testing of primary and secondary outcomes; subgroups without multiplicity adjustment; planned interim analysis removed from protocol; analyses replicated by an independent academic group (UMC Groningen).
5. Actual results
- Results
Primary composite: 197/2152 (9.2%) vs 312/2152 (14.5%), HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.51-0.72), NNT 19 (15-27). Kidney composite HR 0.56 (0.45-0.68); CV death or HF hospitalisation HR 0.71 (0.55-0.92); all-cause death 101 (4.7%) vs 146 (6.8%), HR 0.69 (0.53-0.88). CV death alone HR 0.81 (0.58-1.12). T2DM subgroup HR 0.64 (0.52-0.79); no T2DM HR 0.50 (0.35-0.72). Safety: serious AEs 29.5% vs 33.9%; amputation 35/2149 (1.6%) vs 39/2149 (1.8%); definite/probable DKA 0 vs 2; major hypoglycaemia 0.7% vs 1.3%; volume depletion 5.9% vs 4.2% (p=0.01); fractures 4.0% vs 3.2% (p=0.22).
- Absolute risks
Primary outcome 4.6 vs 7.5 events/100 patient-years (absolute difference 5.3 percentage points over median 2.4 years); all-cause death 2.2 vs 3.1/100 patient-years (2.1 percentage points).
- Authors' conclusion
Lower risk of kidney failure, CV death and death.
6. Strengths
- Large double-blind RCT with central IWRS randomisation and identical placebo
- Adjudicated hard kidney, cardiovascular and mortality outcomes
- 99.7% trial completion; vital status known for all but 5 participants
- Pre-specified hierarchical testing; independent academic replication of analyses
- Prespecified safety outcomes including amputation and adjudicated DKA
7. Weaknesses
- Stopped early for benefit (408 of planned 681 events), which can overestimate effect size and reduces power for secondary outcomes
- Industry sponsored with sponsor employees among authors
- Selected population (albuminuric CKD on RAS blockade); type 1 diabetes excluded
- Only selected adverse events collected
- Fournier's gangrene assessed by a sponsor internal safety group
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- RoB 2
- Type of assessment
- structured assessment based on the full text by a single reviewer (no formal double review)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- low
- Rationale
Unchanged (low). Caveat: truncation for benefit may overstate effects; industry sponsorship mitigated by independent replication. Single-reviewer structured judgement; a formal RoB 2 needs two independent reviewers.
| Domain | Judgement | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| D1 Randomisation process | low | Sequestered fixed randomisation schedule with balanced blocks via IVRS/IWRS, stratified by T2DM and UACR; baseline characteristics balanced. |
| D2 Deviations from intended interventions | low | Double-blind with identical tablets; ITT analysis; discontinuation similar (12.7% vs 14.4%). |
| D3 Missing outcome data | low | 99.7% completed; 11 withdrew consent; vital status missing for 5. |
| D4 Measurement of the outcome | low | Blinded independent adjudication; eGFR outcomes from central laboratory. |
| D5 Selection of the reported result | low | Protocol and SAP published; hierarchical testing; removal of interim analysis and early stopping documented. Early stopping for benefit noted as a source of possible effect overestimation. |
Full-text review (25 October 2026): Added full eligibility, 21 countries/386 sites, randomisation/blinding, component outcomes, subgroup HRs, safety table (amputation 1.6% vs 1.8%, DKA 0 vs 2, volume depletion 5.9% vs 4.2%), early stopping at 408/681 events, sponsor role and independent replication. Bias unchanged (low).
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
Effect sizes are large and precise with absolute benefits clinically meaningful; early stopping may inflate the point estimates somewhat, but CIs remain far from null. Safety data show no excess of amputation or DKA in this population, though rare harms cannot be excluded with 2.4 years of follow-up.
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Contradicts C-ODD-06 (Forxiga 'kills'); context for C-ODD-02.
11. Independent contrary findings
Adverse effects listed in archive studies.
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Multinational trial including European sites or directly applicable to EU practice.
13. Overall methodological judgement
High-quality evidence that dapagliflozin reduces kidney failure, cardiovascular events and death in albuminuric CKD with or without T2DM, with no excess amputations and no DKA cases in this population. Directly contradicts claims that dapagliflozin 'kills'; consistent with DKA being a rare, population-dependent risk rather than refuting it.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | high |
| Risk of bias | low |
| Precision of results | high |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
Long-term (>2.4 years) safety; reversibility of the initial eGFR dip; effects in type 1 diabetes and non-albuminuric CKD.
15. Linked fact checks
- SGLT2 inhibitors such as dapagliflozin (Forxiga) can cause ketoacidosis, sometimes with normal or low blood glucose. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim
- Every major class of glucose-lowering drug (metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists) carries a documented signal of serious harm in the peer-reviewed literature. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim
- Glucose-lowering drugs are net harmful and belong among the 'forbidden' items; dapagliflozin (Forxiga) is among the 'dirtiest' drugs and kills the brain; leg amputations happen only to people taking diabetes drugs and insulin. – Studies contradicting or limiting the claim