Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-ODD-103 in-depth review

SGLT2 drugs roughly double the rare risk of ketoacidosis

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Overview

Colacci M et al.. Can J Diabetes 2022 · PMID 34116926 · DOI 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.04.006

RCTs: RR 2.46; absolute risk about 0.6-2.2 cases per 1,000 patient-years.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Quantify DKA risk with SGLT2 inhibitors.

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis of trials and cohorts.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

About 360,000 participants.

What was actually found?

Higher DKA risk in trials and cohorts.

How large was the observed effect?

RR 2.46 (1.16-5.21) RCTs; RR 1.74 (1.07-2.83) cohorts.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Rare but real; patients need sick-day rules and ketone checks.

What are the study's limitations?

Few trials, few events.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports the ketoacidosis part of the claim.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

It does not show the drugs are net harmful.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Colacci M et al.
Journal
Can J Diabetes
Year
2022
Identifier
PMID 34116926 DOI 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.04.006
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Not stated in abstract.

2. Research question

How large is the risk of DKA with SGLT2 inhibitors in adults with type 2 diabetes?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs and cohort studies (random effects, Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman)
Population

Adults with type 2 diabetes

Country

International

Period

Searches to 15 April 2019

Sample size

7 RCTs (42,375 participants; 4 pooled) and 5 cohort studies (318,636 participants)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

RCTs and observational studies quantifying DKA with an SGLT2 inhibitor vs other drugs or placebo; no language restriction

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

SGLT2 inhibitors

Comparator

Placebo or other glucose-lowering drugs

Endpoints

Diabetic ketoacidosis

Statistical methods

Random-effects RR; I2

5. Actual results

Results

RCTs: absolute DKA rate 0.6-2.2 per 1,000 person-years with SGLT2 inhibitors; pooled RR 2.46 (95% CI 1.16-5.21; I2 0%). Observational: 0.6-4.9 per 1,000 person-years; RR 1.74 (1.07-2.83; I2 45%).

Absolute risks

0.6-2.2 per 1,000 person-years in RCTs; 0.6-4.9 per 1,000 person-years in cohorts.

Authors' conclusion

SGLT2 inhibitors increase the risk of DKA in adults with type 2 diabetes in both observational studies and large RCTs.

6. Strengths

  • Combines randomised and observational evidence
  • Absolute rates reported
  • Cited by ADA Standards 2026

7. Weaknesses

  • Only 4 RCTs pooled
  • Search ended 2019 (before DAPA-CKD/EMPA-KIDNEY)
  • Few events; wide CI

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Two independent reviewers; small number of pooled trials.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

CIs log-symmetric (stats/C-ODD-02.py). Relative risk about doubled, but absolute risk remains around 1-2 per 1,000 person-years.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Confirms the core of the claim that SGLT2 inhibitors can cause ketoacidosis.

11. Independent contrary findings

Palmer 2021 network meta-analysis judged no increase (moderate certainty); superseded by Shi 2023 (I-ODD-107) and SMART-C 2022 (I-ODD-106), both showing about doubled risk.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High; same drugs and labels.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports a real but rare DKA risk.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Risk under prolonged fasting or very-low-carbohydrate eating is not quantified in RCTs.

15. Linked fact checks