Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkfull text checked★ key study I-ODD-106 in-depth review

13 large trials: SGLT2 drugs protect kidneys and heart; ketoacidosis rare

Impact of diabetes on the effects of sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors on kidney outcomes: collaborative meta-analysis of large placebo-controlled trials.

Overview

Nuffield Department of Population Health Renal Studies Group; SMART-C Consortium. Lancet 2022 · PMID 36351458 · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02074-8

Kidney progression -37%, CV death -14%; DKA risk doubled from about 0.2 per 1,000 patient-years.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Pool all large placebo-controlled SGLT2 inhibitor trials.

How was the study done?

Collaborative meta-analysis of 13 blinded RCTs.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

90,409 participants.

What was actually found?

Clear kidney and heart benefits; DKA doubled but rare; amputation signal mainly from one trial.

How large was the observed effect?

RR 0.63 kidney; RR 0.86 CV death; DKA RR 2.12.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

For 1,000 people with diabetes and kidney disease treated for a year, about 26 serious events are avoided and about 2 caused.

What are the study's limitations?

Summary data; industry trials.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Confirms DKA risk, refutes net harm.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

High.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Effects in people following prolonged fasting regimens.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Nuffield Department of Population Health Renal Studies Group; SMART-C Consortium
Journal
Lancet
Year
2022
Identifier
PMID 36351458 DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02074-8
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
full text
Conflicts of interest and funding

UK Medical Research Council and Kidney Research UK; several authors report industry-funded trial work (declarations in full text).

2. Research question

What are the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney, cardiovascular and safety outcomes in people with and without diabetes?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Collaborative meta-analysis of large double-blind placebo-controlled trials (SMART-C)
Population

Participants of 13 large SGLT2 inhibitor trials (82.7% with diabetes)

Country

International

Period

Trials published to 5 September 2022

Sample size

90,409 participants in 13 trials

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, >=500 per group, >=6 months, adults

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

SGLT2 inhibitors

Comparator

Placebo

Endpoints

Kidney disease progression, AKI, CV death or HF hospitalisation, CV and non-CV death; safety: ketoacidosis, lower-limb amputation

Statistical methods

Inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis of summary data (partly re-analysed by trial investigators); absolute effects per 1,000 patient-years

5. Actual results

Results

Kidney disease progression RR 0.63 (0.58-0.69); AKI RR 0.77 (0.70-0.84); CV death or HF hospitalisation RR 0.77 (0.74-0.81); CV death RR 0.86 (0.81-0.92); non-CV death RR 0.94 (0.88-1.02). Ketoacidosis in diabetes RR 2.12 (1.49-3.04), baseline about 0.2 per 1,000 patient-years; one event among non-diabetic SGLT2i users in about 30,000 participant-years. Lower-limb amputation: CANVAS 6.3 vs 3.4 per 1,000 PY; other 12 trials RR 1.06 (0.93-1.21); all trials RR 1.15 (1.02-1.30). Per 1,000 patients with CKD and diabetes per year: 11 fewer kidney progression, 4 fewer AKI, 11 fewer CV death/HF hospitalisation, about 1 DKA and 1 amputation caused.

Absolute risks

DKA excess about 0.22 per 1,000 patient-years (stats/C-ODD-02.py); benefit-harm balance about 26 events avoided vs 2 caused per 1,000 patient-years in CKD with diabetes.

Authors' conclusion

Randomised data support SGLT2 inhibitors for reducing kidney progression and AKI in type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk and in CKD or heart failure irrespective of diabetes; absolute benefits outweigh serious hazards of ketoacidosis or amputation.

6. Strengths

  • Only large blinded RCTs
  • Standardised kidney outcome
  • Absolute benefit-harm estimates
  • Hypothesis-testing analysis of amputation excluding CANVAS

7. Weaknesses

  • Summary-level, not individual data
  • Trials mostly industry-sponsored
  • Ketoacidosis events few

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
low
Rationale

Pre-registered (PROSPERO CRD42022351618); trials at low risk of bias.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

All ratio CIs log-symmetric (stats/C-ODD-02.py, C-ODD-06.py). Significant heterogeneity for amputation (CANVAS vs others, p=0.0007) indicates the CANVAS signal was not replicated.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Quantifies both the DKA harm (supporting C-ODD-02) and the net benefit (contradicting C-ODD-06); shows amputation signal mainly from CANVAS (limiting C-ODD-05).

11. Independent contrary findings

None of comparable quality showing net harm.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Pivotal high-quality evidence: SGLT2 inhibitors roughly double a rare DKA risk while preventing many more serious kidney and heart events.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biaslow
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Risk under prolonged fasting/ketogenic diets.

15. Linked fact checks