Meta-analysisindependent cross-checkabstract only checked I-ODD-12 standard review

Fournier gangrene in SGLT2 trials

Fournier's gangrene and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Overview

Silverii GA et al.. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020 · PMID 31637829 · DOI 10.1111/dom.13900

Across 84 trials Fournier gangrene was not more frequent, but cases were too few to be sure.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

SGLT2 inhibitors and Fournier gangrene

How was the study done?

Meta-analysis of 84 RCTs

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

42,415 SGLT2i vs 27,158 comparators; Type 2 diabetes in RCTs

What was actually found?

OR 0.41 (n.s.).

How large was the observed effect?

MH-OR 0.41 (0.09-1.82)

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Very rare; no confirmed excess.

What are the study's limitations?

Very few events; FG not systematically adjudicated

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Limits C-ODD-08.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Multinational trial including European sites or directly applicable to EU practice.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Exclude risk.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Silverii GA et al.
Journal
Diabetes Obes Metab
Year
2020
Identifier
PMID 31637829 DOI 10.1111/dom.13900
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25 (this agent)
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

SGLT2 inhibitors and Fournier gangrene

3. Study design and population

Study design
Meta-analysis – Meta-analysis of 84 RCTs
Population

Type 2 diabetes in RCTs

Country

International

Period

RCTs to 2019

Sample size

42,415 SGLT2i vs 27,158 comparators

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

As described in the abstract; details not available in abstract.

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

SGLT2 inhibitors

Comparator

Placebo/active

Endpoints

Fournier gangrene; abscess, cellulitis, erysipelas

Statistical methods

Mantel-Haenszel OR

5. Actual results

Results

FG MH-OR 0.41 (0.09-1.82); abscess 0.94; cellulitis 0.90; erysipelas 0.89; few events, wide CIs.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

No difference observed; cannot rule out increase due to few events.

6. Strengths

  • All RCTs

7. Weaknesses

  • Very few events
  • FG not systematically adjudicated

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Sparse data.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Imprecise null.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Limits C-ODD-08.

11. Independent contrary findings

A-ODD-12.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Multinational trial including European sites or directly applicable to EU practice.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Imprecise null.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

None beyond those stated.

15. Linked fact checks