Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract only checked I-ORG-08 standard review
Finland: antibiotics for appendicitis after 5 years
Five-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial.
Overview
Salminen P et al.. JAMA 2018 · PMID 30264120 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.13201
About 61% treated with antibiotics never needed their appendix removed in 5 years.
Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high
Plain-language summary
Study explained simply
- What did the researchers want to find out?
Long-term
- How was the study done?
RCT follow-up
- How many people, animals or samples were studied?
530
- What was actually found?
39.1% recurrence
- How large was the observed effect?
39.1%
- What do the results mean in everyday life?
Many can avoid surgery
- What are the study's limitations?
Open surgery comparator
- What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?
Partly supports
- Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?
European
- What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?
Complicated appendicitis
Scientific in-depth review
1. Full reference
- Authors
- Salminen P et al.
- Journal
- JAMA
- Year
- 2018
- Identifier
- PMID 30264120 DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.13201
- Verification
- verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
- Retracted
- no
- Corrections
Erratum (JAMA 2018;320(16):1711)
- Extent checked
- abstract only
- Conflicts of interest and funding
not stated in abstract
2. Research question
Late recurrence after antibiotic treatment
3. Study design and population
- Study design
- Randomised controlled trial – 5-year follow-up of RCT
- Country
Finland
- Sample size
530 (257 antibiotics)
4. Methods and endpoints
5. Actual results
- Results
Cumulative recurrence 39.1% at 5 years; complications 24.4% after appendectomy vs 6.5% antibiotics.
- Absolute risks
not reported
- Authors' conclusion
Supports feasibility of antibiotics alone for uncomplicated appendicitis.
6. Strengths
- Randomized, CT-confirmed
7. Weaknesses
- Open appendectomy (not laparoscopic)
8. Risk of bias
- Orienting tool
- RoB 2
- Type of assessment
- simplified assessment (abstract only)
- Full formal assessment
- no
- Overall risk of bias
- some concerns
9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation
10. Relevance to the specific claim
Supports C-ORG-17 (appendectomy not always necessary for uncomplicated cases).
11. Independent contrary findings
12. Transferability to Germany and Europe
Directly European.
13. Overall methodological judgement
Supports antibiotic option.
| Multidimensional assessment | |
|---|---|
| Authenticity of the source | verified |
| Methodological quality | high |
| Risk of bias | some concerns |
| Precision of results | moderate |
| Directness | direct |
| Reproducibility | replicated |
| Consistency with the overall evidence | consistent |
| Regional transferability | high |
| Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive) | not applicable |
14. Open questions
15. Linked fact checks
- The appendix (like tonsils and adenoids) is removed far too readily from early childhood onward. – Studies supporting the claim