Randomised controlled trialindependent cross-checkabstract only checked I-ORG-08 standard review

Finland: antibiotics for appendicitis after 5 years

Five-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial.

Overview

Salminen P et al.. JAMA 2018 · PMID 30264120 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.13201

About 61% treated with antibiotics never needed their appendix removed in 5 years.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: high

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Long-term

How was the study done?

RCT follow-up

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

530

What was actually found?

39.1% recurrence

How large was the observed effect?

39.1%

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Many can avoid surgery

What are the study's limitations?

Open surgery comparator

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Partly supports

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

European

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Complicated appendicitis

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Salminen P et al.
Journal
JAMA
Year
2018
Identifier
PMID 30264120 DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.13201
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections

Erratum (JAMA 2018;320(16):1711)

Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Late recurrence after antibiotic treatment

3. Study design and population

Study design
Randomised controlled trial – 5-year follow-up of RCT
Country

Finland

Sample size

530 (257 antibiotics)

4. Methods and endpoints

5. Actual results

Results

Cumulative recurrence 39.1% at 5 years; complications 24.4% after appendectomy vs 6.5% antibiotics.

Absolute risks

not reported

Authors' conclusion

Supports feasibility of antibiotics alone for uncomplicated appendicitis.

6. Strengths

  • Randomized, CT-confirmed

7. Weaknesses

  • Open appendectomy (not laparoscopic)

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
RoB 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports C-ORG-17 (appendectomy not always necessary for uncomplicated cases).

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Directly European.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports antibiotic option.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualityhigh
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityreplicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

15. Linked fact checks