Ecological studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-ORG-112 in-depth review

US thyroid cancer trends 1974-2013

Trends in Thyroid Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the United States, 1974-2013.

Overview

Lim H et al.. JAMA 2017 · PMID 28362912 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2017.2719

Thyroid cancer diagnoses tripled; deaths rose only slightly, mainly from advanced cancers.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Check whether rising thyroid cancer diagnoses reflect a real increase

How was the study done?

US cancer registry analysis

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

77,276 patients

What was actually found?

Incidence tripled; small rise in mortality for advanced disease

How large was the observed effect?

Mortality +1.1% per year

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Most new cases are small, but some real increase exists

What are the study's limitations?

Registry data only

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Mostly supports overdiagnosis, with a caveat

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Similar patterns in Europe

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot say which individual cancers need surgery

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Lim H et al.
Journal
JAMA
Year
2017
Identifier
PMID 28362912 DOI 10.1001/jama.2017.2719
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

NIH intramural research (PubMed).

2. Research question

Have increases in papillary thyroid cancer incidence been accompanied by changes in thyroid cancer mortality?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Ecological study – Registry-based trend analysis (SEER-9), incidence and incidence-based mortality by histology and stage
Population

Patients diagnosed with thyroid cancer in SEER-9 areas

Country

USA

Period

Diagnoses 1974-2013; deaths 1994-2013

Sample size

77,276 patients; 2371 thyroid cancer deaths

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

SEER-9 registry cases

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Calendar period; tumour characteristics

Comparator

Earlier periods

Endpoints

Age-adjusted incidence and incidence-based mortality

Statistical methods

Annual percent change by log-linear regression

5. Actual results

Results

Incidence increased 3.6% per year (95% CI 3.2-3.9%) from 4.56 to 14.42 per 100,000 person-years, mainly papillary cancer (APC 4.4%). Papillary incidence rose for all stages, including distant stage (2.4% per year). Incidence-based mortality increased 1.1% per year (0.6-1.6%) from 0.40 to 0.46 per 100,000 and 2.9% per year (1.1-4.7%) for distant-stage papillary cancer.

Absolute risks

Incidence about tripled (4.56 to 14.42 per 100,000); mortality 0.40 to 0.46 per 100,000.

Authors' conclusion

Increases in incidence and mortality for advanced-stage papillary thyroid cancer are consistent with a true increase in thyroid cancer occurrence in the US.

6. Strengths

  • Long registry series
  • Stage-specific analysis

7. Weaknesses

  • Ecological
  • Incidence-based mortality small numbers

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
none applicable
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
not assessable
Rationale

Population registry analysis.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Incidence tripled (ratio 3.16) while mortality rose only 15% in relative terms and 0.06 per 100,000 in absolute terms (stats/C-ORG-14_15_thyroid_cs.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Main counter-argument: part of the rise is a real increase, not only overdiagnosis.

11. Independent contrary findings

Li 2024 (I-ORG-113) and Davies 2014 (A-ORG-19) attribute most of the increase to overdiagnosis.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

US data; European countries show similar but variable patterns.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Refines rather than refutes the overdiagnosis claim: most of the rise is small cancers, but a small true increase in advanced cancers and mortality also exists.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biasnot assessable
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Causes of the true increase (e.g. obesity, radiation).

15. Linked fact checks