Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-ORG-122 standard review

Do tonsil and adenoid operations change later infections in children?

Adenotonsillectomy Does not Alter the Risk of Upper Airway Infections in Children.

Overview

Kim JY et al.. Laryngoscope 2021 · PMID 33720418 · DOI 10.1002/lary.29506

Over 9 years, children who had the operation had the same number of upper airway infections as similar children who did not.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test whether adenotonsillectomy changes later infections

How was the study done?

Matched population cohort with equivalence testing

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

2377 operated Korean children and about 9000 controls

What was actually found?

No difference in pharyngitis, sinusitis or ear infections

How large was the observed effect?

Equivalent within ±0.5 visits

What do the results mean in everyday life?

The operation did not increase later airway infections

What are the study's limitations?

Claims data; children only

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts the claim

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Moderate

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot address adulthood

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Kim JY et al.
Journal
Laryngoscope
Year
2021
Identifier
PMID 33720418 DOI 10.1002/lary.29506
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26; Crossref works API 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Non-commercial support (PubMed).

2. Research question

Does childhood adenotonsillectomy change the later frequency of upper airway infections?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Population-based follow-up study with propensity-score-matched controls (Korean NHIS National Sample Cohort); equivalence testing
Population

Children < 10 years with adenotonsillectomy and matched controls

Country

South Korea

Period

Follow-up years 1-9 after surgery

Sample size

2377 operated; controls 9204 (APT), 9196 (ARS), 8788 (AOM)

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Children < 10 years in the NHIS sample cohort

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

Adenotonsillectomy

Comparator

Propensity-matched children with the same infection diagnoses (1:4)

Endpoints

Hospital visits for acute pharyngotonsillitis, rhinosinusitis and otitis media

Statistical methods

Equivalence test (margin -0.5 to 0.5 visits)

5. Actual results

Results

No significant differences in the incidence of pharyngitis, rhinosinusitis or otitis media between operated and control children from postoperative year 1 to year 9 (within the equivalence margin). Visits declined over time in both groups.

Absolute risks

Not reported

Authors' conclusion

Adenotonsillectomy does not alter the frequency of upper airway infections in children.

6. Strengths

  • Matched comparison with children having the same infections
  • Long follow-up

7. Weaknesses

  • Claims data
  • Outcome = visits, not severity
  • Adult outcomes not studied

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Matching on prior infection reduces confounding by indication compared with Byars 2018.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Equivalence design is appropriate for a 'no change' conclusion.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Directly contradicts the claim that childhood adenotonsillectomy increases later upper respiratory disease, at least up to 9 years.

11. Independent contrary findings

Byars 2018 (A-ORG-01) found RR about 2-3 for upper respiratory disease to age 30.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Korean; biology transferable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Important contradicting evidence from a design with better control for indication.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceinconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Adult outcomes.

15. Linked fact checks