Systematic reviewindependent cross-checkabstract only checked★ key study I-PPI-06 in-depth review

Rebound symptoms after stopping PPIs – review

Systematic review: symptoms of rebound acid hypersecretion following proton pump inhibitor treatment.

Overview

Lødrup AB et al.. Scand J Gastroenterol 2013 · PMID 23311977 · DOI 10.3109/00365521.2012.746395

Volunteers often get mild symptoms for up to 4 weeks; patients' studies show no clear rebound.

Does the study support the specific claim? Partly · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

RAHS symptoms.

How was the study done?

Systematic review.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

5 studies.

What was actually found?

Mild transient symptoms in volunteers.

How large was the observed effect?

44%.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Temporary symptoms.

What are the study's limitations?

Few studies.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports rebound, limits 'addiction'.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Effect in patients.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Lødrup AB et al.
Journal
Scand J Gastroenterol
Year
2013
Identifier
PMID 23311977 DOI 10.3109/00365521.2012.746395
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-25
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

not stated in abstract

2. Research question

Clinically relevant symptoms caused by acid rebound after PPI treatment

3. Study design and population

Study design
Systematic review – Systematic review
Population

Volunteers and reflux patients

Country

Multinational

Period

PubMed search

Sample size

5 studies

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies on RAHS symptoms

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

PPI withdrawal

Endpoints

Acid-related symptoms

Statistical methods

Narrative synthesis

5. Actual results

Results

Two studies in asymptomatic volunteers: 44% acid-related symptoms up to 4 weeks after withdrawal, mostly mild to moderate; three studies in reflux patients: no signs of symptomatic rebound (methodological weaknesses).

Absolute risks

not applicable

Authors' conclusion

RAHS induces reflux-like symptoms in volunteers; significance in patients unclear.

6. Strengths

  • Focused question

7. Weaknesses

  • Only PubMed; 5 studies
  • Authors include Reimer (A-PPI-14) – not independent

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBIS
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Limited search; overlapping authors.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

10. Relevance to the specific claim

C-PPI-06, -07.

11. Independent contrary findings

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

High.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Confirms transient rebound in volunteers; uncertain in patients.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsnot applicable
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Rebound in patients?

15. Linked fact checks