Cohort studyindependent cross-checkabstract checked★ key study I-PPI-111 in-depth review

No extra kidney decline with PPIs vs H2 blockers in Spain

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Worsening Kidney Function: A Retrospective Cohort Study Including 122,606 Acid-Suppressing Users.

Overview

González-Pérez A et al.. J Gen Intern Med 2025 · PMID 39627545 · DOI 10.1007/s11606-024-09213-8

In 122,606 new users, kidney function worsened equally often with PPIs and ranitidine after accounting for differences between users.

Does the study support the specific claim? No · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Compare kidney outcomes of PPI and H2RA starters.

How was the study done?

Population cohort.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

122,606 people in Aragon.

What was actually found?

Adjusted HR 0.99 for eGFR<60; less AKI with PPI.

How large was the observed effect?

HR 0.99 (0.66-1.48).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

PPIs are unlikely to be a major cause of kidney decline.

What are the study's limitations?

Few H2RA users; short follow-up.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Contradicts PPIs causing CKD.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Directly applicable.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot exclude small long-term effects.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
González-Pérez A et al.
Journal
J Gen Intern Med
Year
2025
Identifier
PMID 39627545 DOI 10.1007/s11606-024-09213-8
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

No conflicts of interest declared

2. Research question

Do PPI initiators have a higher risk of worsening kidney function or AKI than H2RA initiators?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Cohort study – Retrospective population-based new-user active-comparator cohort (BIGAN, Aragon)
Population

Initiators of PPIs or H2RAs with preserved renal function

Country

Spain

Period

2015-2021

Sample size

119,520 PPI and 3086 H2RA initiators

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Preserved kidney function at baseline

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

PPI (e.g., omeprazole)

Comparator

H2RA (ranitidine)

Endpoints

Worsening kidney function (eGFR<60, sCr doubling, eGFR fall 30-50%, ESRD); AKI

Statistical methods

Cox regression adjusted for confounders

5. Actual results

Results

Crude incidence of eGFR<60 higher with omeprazole (31.2/1000 PY) than ranitidine (18.7), but adjusted HR 0.99 (0.66-1.48). AKI lower with omeprazole: HR 0.54 (0.42-0.70).

Absolute risks

Crude IR 31.2 vs 18.7 per 1000 PY (eGFR<60); not different after adjustment

Authors' conclusion

No clinically relevant difference in worsening kidney function between PPI and H2RA initiators.

6. Strengths

  • Active comparator
  • Laboratory-defined outcomes

7. Weaknesses

  • Small H2RA group
  • Short follow-up (up to ~6 y)
  • Observational

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Confounding by indication reduced by active comparator.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Crude difference vanishes after adjustment: a sign that baseline differences drive crude associations (stats/C-PPI-01_kidney_mortality.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

European active-comparator data not supporting a kidney-damaging effect of PPIs.

11. Independent contrary findings

Xie 2017 (A-PPI-02) and Ang 2024 (I-PPI-112) report higher CKD risk vs H2RA.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Directly applicable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Adds to uncertainty about causality of the CKD signal.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultslow
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidencemixed
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Long-term (>5 y) effects.

15. Linked fact checks