Otherindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-PPI-115 standard review

More pneumonia during periods of PPI use

Proton pump inhibitor use and risk of pneumonia: a self-controlled case series study.

Overview

Maret-Ouda J et al.. J Gastroenterol 2023 · PMID 37314495 · DOI 10.1007/s00535-023-02007-5

In Sweden, people had 73% more pneumonia episodes during times they took PPIs than during times they did not.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Test PPIs and pneumonia within the same people.

How was the study done?

Self-controlled case series.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

519,152 patients.

What was actually found?

IRR 1.73; H2RA 1.08.

How large was the observed effect?

1.73 (1.71-1.75).

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Pneumonia risk may rise during PPI use.

What are the study's limitations?

Possible bias from timing of prescriptions.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports the pneumonia association.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Swedish data.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Cannot prove causation.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Maret-Ouda J et al.
Journal
J Gastroenterol
Year
2023
Identifier
PMID 37314495 DOI 10.1007/s00535-023-02007-5
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

Swedish Research Council; no conflicts declared

2. Research question

Does PPI use increase pneumonia risk within individuals?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Other – Nationwide self-controlled case series
Population

Swedish patients with >=1 pneumonia episode

Country

Sweden

Period

2005-2019

Sample size

519,152 patients; 307,709 PPI periods

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

People with pneumonia in national registers

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

PPI-exposed periods

Comparator

Unexposed periods in the same person

Endpoints

Pneumonia

Statistical methods

Conditional fixed-effect Poisson regression (IRR)

5. Actual results

Results

IRR 1.73 (1.71-1.75) during PPI use; H2RA IRR 1.08 (1.02-1.14).

Absolute risks

Not reported

Authors' conclusion

PPI use seems associated with increased pneumonia risk; caution in people with prior pneumonia.

6. Strengths

  • Controls for fixed between-person confounding
  • H2RA comparison

7. Weaknesses

  • Time-varying confounding (prodromal symptoms, aspiration) possible

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
ROBINS-E
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

SCCS assumptions may be violated if pneumonia affects PPI exposure.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Precise but possibly biased; inconsistent with RCT estimates (stats/C-PPI-05_pneumonia.py).

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Strongest recent observational support for the pneumonia part.

11. Independent contrary findings

RCT meta-analyses (I-PPI-113, I-PPI-114).

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Directly applicable.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports association; causality disputed.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultshigh
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilitypartly replicated
Consistency with the overall evidenceinconsistent
Regional transferabilityhigh
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Why RCTs and SCCS disagree.

15. Linked fact checks