Systematic reviewindependent cross-checkabstract checked I-PPI-119 standard review

A quarter of adults take acid blockers

Proton pump inhibitor use: systematic review of global trends and practices.

Overview

Shanika LGT et al.. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2023 · PMID 37420019 · DOI 10.1007/s00228-023-03534-z

Data from 23 countries suggest nearly one in four adults uses a PPI, many at high doses and for more than a year.

Does the study support the specific claim? Yes · Methodological quality: moderate

Original publication

Plain-language summary

Study explained simply
What did the researchers want to find out?

Describe global PPI use.

How was the study done?

Systematic review.

How many people, animals or samples were studied?

28 million users.

What was actually found?

~25% of adults; two-thirds high dose; 25% >1 year.

How large was the observed effect?

Not applicable.

What do the results mean in everyday life?

Many people may take PPIs longer than needed.

What are the study's limitations?

Heterogeneous data.

What does it say about Elawady's specific claim?

Supports overuse claim.

Do the results apply to Germany and Europe?

Includes Europe.

What can explicitly not be concluded from this study?

Does not measure appropriateness directly.

Scientific in-depth review

1. Full reference

Authors
Shanika LGT et al.
Journal
Eur J Clin Pharmacol
Year
2023
Identifier
PMID 37420019 DOI 10.1007/s00228-023-03534-z
Verification
verified – PubMed efetch 2026-10-26 + Crossref 2026-10-26
Retracted
no
Corrections
none
Extent checked
abstract only
Conflicts of interest and funding

No competing interests

2. Research question

What is the global pattern of PPI use in adults?

3. Study design and population

Study design
Systematic review – Systematic review of observational studies on PPI use patterns
Population

Adults >=18 in 23 countries

Country

International

Period

Search to 31 March 2023

Sample size

65 articles; 28 million PPI users

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Observational studies of oral PPI use

4. Methods and endpoints

Exposure / intervention

PPI use

Comparator

Not applicable

Endpoints

Prevalence, dose, duration

Statistical methods

Summed proportions

5. Actual results

Results

Nearly one quarter of adults use a PPI; 63% of users <65 years; nearly two-thirds on high doses (>=DDD); 25% continued >1 year and 28% of these >3 years.

Absolute risks

Not applicable

Authors' conclusion

Widespread use; clinicians should review and deprescribe when no ongoing indication exists.

6. Strengths

  • Global scope

7. Weaknesses

  • Simple summing; heterogeneous sources
  • Few low- and middle-income countries

8. Risk of bias

Orienting tool
AMSTAR 2
Type of assessment
simplified assessment (abstract only)
Full formal assessment
no
Overall risk of bias
some concerns
Rationale

Descriptive pooling.

9. Assessment of the statistical interpretation

Descriptive.

10. Relevance to the specific claim

Supports the extent of (long-term, high-dose) PPI use underlying C-PPI-11.

11. Independent contrary findings

Use does not equal inappropriate use.

12. Transferability to Germany and Europe

Includes European countries.

13. Overall methodological judgement

Supports overuse concern.

Multidimensional assessment
Multidimensional assessment
Authenticity of the sourceverified
Methodological qualitymoderate
Risk of biassome concerns
Precision of resultsmoderate
Directnessdirect
Reproducibilityunknown
Consistency with the overall evidenceconsistent
Regional transferabilitymoderate
Adequacy of the interpretation (by the archive)not applicable

14. Open questions

Egyptian data.

15. Linked fact checks